[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220317023914.GX8224@magnolia>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 19:39:14 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Fix missing error code in
xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent()
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 09:39:30AM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> The error code is missing in this code scenario, add the error code
> '-EINVAL' to the return value 'error'.
>
> Eliminate the follow smatch warning:
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c:634 xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() warn: missing
> error code 'error'.
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> index 54e68e5693fd..7265f8850f65 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
> @@ -631,6 +631,7 @@ xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent(
> if (!xfs_iext_lookup_extent_before(ip, ifp, end_fsb, &icur, &got) ||
> got.br_startoff + got.br_blockcount <= offset_fsb) {
> *end_fsb = offset_fsb;
> + error = -EINVAL;
Why would we return EINVAL for the case where there's no work left to
do?
--D
> goto out_cancel;
> }
>
> --
> 2.20.1.7.g153144c
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists