lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <164754451515.3036648.9457796820741527004.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:15:15 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     festevam@...il.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, nicoleotsuka@...il.com,
        tiwai@...e.com, Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        Xiubo.Lee@...il.com, shengjiu.wang@...il.com
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Add new registers included on i.MX8ULP

On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 13:28:58 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> There are some new registers added on i.MX8ULP, they are
> the SPDIF transmit Professional C channel registers,
> 192bit SPDIF receive C channel registers, and 192bit SPDIF
> transmit C channel registers.
> 
> There are two output lines, SPDIF_OUT1 and SPDIF_OUT2, the
> original REG_SPDIF_STCSCH and REG_SPDIF_STCSCL are used for
> SPDIF_OUT1, the new REG_SPDIF_STCSPH and REG_SPDIF_STCSPL
> are used for SPDIF_OUT2, the 192bit SPDIF C channel registers
> are used for both.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Add new registers included on i.MX8ULP
      commit: 638cec39339db40df9fc2ece0411a64856669b93

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ