[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fXbGWec6RVoEhhR4YnCSBOA5iU--_fOA6_+=375wm3SQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 20:09:58 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf header: Fix spelling mistake "could't" -> "couldn't"
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 4:22 PM Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com> wrote:
>
> There is a spelling mistake in a pr_debug2 message. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Thanks,
Ian
> ---
> tools/perf/util/header.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> index 6da12e522edc..4a44a0740f43 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
> @@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ static int build_mem_topology(struct memory_node *nodes, u64 size, u64 *cntp)
>
> dir = opendir(path);
> if (!dir) {
> - pr_debug2("%s: could't read %s, does this arch have topology information?\n",
> + pr_debug2("%s: couldn't read %s, does this arch have topology information?\n",
> __func__, path);
> return -1;
> }
> --
> 2.35.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists