[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220317000410.GU11336@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 21:04:10 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Kumar, Sanjay K" <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"Zanussi, Tom" <tom.zanussi@...el.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] iommu/vt-d: Implement device_pasid domain attach
ops
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:23:26PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> Kernel users (ring0) can supply any PASID when they use
> the ENQCMDS instruction. Is that what you mean when you
> say "real applications"?
I'm not talking about ENQCMD at all
I'm saying I don't see much utility to have two PASIDs assigned to the
same device that perform the same IOVA translation.
So I would expect the list of attachments in an iommu_domain to have
exactly one device in it and multiple PASIDs to the same device from
the same iommu_domain is a oddball corner case we don't need to
optimize for, beyond being able to allow it to happen.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists