linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net: icmp: introduce __ping_queue_rcv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f6c1dbe5-ba6f-6e68-aa3b-4fe018d5092f@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 16 Mar 2022 21:56:06 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To:     menglong8.dong@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc:     rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, xeb@...l.ru,
        davem@...emloft.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
        imagedong@...cent.com, edumazet@...gle.com, kafai@...com,
        talalahmad@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org, alobakin@...me,
        flyingpeng@...cent.com, mengensun@...cent.com,
        dongli.zhang@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, benbjiang@...cent.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net: icmp: introduce
 __ping_queue_rcv_skb() to report drop reasons

On 3/16/22 12:31 AM, menglong8.dong@...il.com wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ping.c b/net/ipv4/ping.c
> index 3ee947557b88..9a1ea6c263f8 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ping.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ping.c
> @@ -934,16 +934,24 @@ int ping_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, int noblock,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ping_recvmsg);
>  
> -int ping_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static enum skb_drop_reason __ping_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk,
> +						 struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> +	enum skb_drop_reason reason;
> +
>  	pr_debug("ping_queue_rcv_skb(sk=%p,sk->num=%d,skb=%p)\n",
>  		 inet_sk(sk), inet_sk(sk)->inet_num, skb);
> -	if (sock_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb) < 0) {
> -		kfree_skb(skb);
> +	if (sock_queue_rcv_skb_reason(sk, skb, &reason) < 0) {
> +		kfree_skb_reason(skb, reason);
>  		pr_debug("ping_queue_rcv_skb -> failed\n");
> -		return -1;
> +		return reason;
>  	}
> -	return 0;
> +	return SKB_NOT_DROPPED_YET;
> +}
> +
> +int ping_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	return __ping_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb) ?: -1;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ping_queue_rcv_skb);
>  

This is a generic proto callback and you are now changing its return
code in a way that seems to conflict with existing semantics