| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <569f50d5-8f13-280e-b944-6e26d95dc50b@os.amperecomputing.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 15:30:32 +0700
From: Quan Nguyen <quan@...amperecomputing.com>
To: minyard@....org
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Open Source Submission <patches@...erecomputing.com>,
Phong Vo <phong@...amperecomputing.com>,
"Thang Q . Nguyen" <thang@...amperecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] ipmi: ssif_bmc: Add SSIF BMC driver
On 11/03/2022 08:19, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 06:41:16PM +0700, Quan Nguyen wrote:
>> The SMBus system interface (SSIF) IPMI BMC driver can be used to perform
>> in-band IPMI communication with their host in management (BMC) side.
>
> Thanks for the update, and removing slave_enable().
>
> I spent some quality time with this, and it looks like there are places
> where you don't check lengths before indexing arrays. I've marked
> several of these, but you need to check it all through this.
>
> I have a few other comments, too.
>
Thank you for the comments, I put my comment inline below.
I'll scan the code and may put some extra fixes if any in next version.
> -corey
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Quan Nguyen <quan@...amperecomputing.com>
>> ---
>> v6:
>> + Drop the use of slave_enable() [Wolfram]
>> + Make i2c-aspeed to issue RxCmdLast command on all
>> I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED event to assert NAK when slave busy [Quan]
>> + Make i2c slave to return -EBUSY when it's busy [Quan]
>> + Drop the aborting feature as return Completion Code 0xFF may stop
>> host to retry and make ipmi_ssif.so fails to load [Quan]
>> + Add timer to recover slave from busy state when no response [Quan]
>> + Clean request/response buffer appropriately [Quan]
>> + Add some minor change on error and warning messages [Quan]
>>
>> v5:
>> + None
>>
>> v4:
>> + Send response with Completion code 0xFF when aborting [Quan]
>> + Added bounding check on SMBus writes and the whole request [Dan]
>> + Moved buffer to end of struct ssif_bmc_ctx to avoid context
>> corruption if somehow buffer is written past the end [Dan]
>> + Return -EINVAL if userspace buffer too small, dont
>> silence truncate [Corey, Joel]
>> + Not necessary to check NONBLOCK in lock [Corey]
>> + Enforce one user at a time [Joel]
>> + Reject write with invalid response length from userspace [Corey]
>> + Add state machines for better ssif bmc state handling [Quan]
>> + Drop ssif_bmc_aspeed.c and make ssif_bmc.c is generic
>> SSIF BMC driver [Quan]
>> + Change compatible string "aspeed,ast2500-ssif-bmc" to
>> "ampere,ssif-bmc" [Quan]
>> + Abort current request with invalid SMBus write or
>> invalid command [Quan]
>> + Abort all request if there is pending response [Quan]
>> + Changed validate_pec() to validate_request() [Quan]
>> + Add unsupported_smbus_cmd() to handle unknown SMBus command [Quan]
>> + Print internal state string for ease investigating issue [Quan]
>> + Move to READY state on SLAVE_STOP event [Quan]
>> + Change initilize_transfer() to process_smbus_cmd() [Quan]
>> + Introduce functions for each slave event [Quan]
>>
>> v3:
>> + Removed redundant license info [Joel]
>> + Switched to use traditional if-else [Joel]
>> + Removed unused ssif_bmc_ioctl() [Joel]
>> + Made handle_request()/complete_response() to return void [Joel]
>> + Refactored send_ssif_bmc_response() and
>> receive_ssif_bmc_request() [Corey]
>> + Removed mutex [Corey]
>> + Use spin_lock/unlock_irqsave/restore in callback [Corey]
>> + Removed the unnecessary memset [Corey]
>> + Switch to use dev_err() [Corey]
>>
>> v2:
>> + Fixed compiling error with COMPILE_TEST for arc
>>
>> drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig | 11 +
>> drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c | 791 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h | 102 +++++
>> 4 files changed, 905 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig b/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
>> index b061e6b513ed..18a89093d64e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
>> @@ -169,6 +169,17 @@ config ASPEED_BT_IPMI_BMC
>> found on Aspeed SOCs (AST2400 and AST2500). The driver
>> implements the BMC side of the BT interface.
>>
>> +config SSIF_IPMI_BMC
>> + tristate "SSIF IPMI BMC driver"
>> + select I2C
>> + select I2C_SLAVE
>> + help
>> + This enables the IPMI SMBus system interface (SSIF) at the
>> + management (BMC) side.
>> +
>> + The driver implements the BMC side of the SMBus system
>> + interface (SSIF).
>> +
>> config IPMB_DEVICE_INTERFACE
>> tristate 'IPMB Interface handler'
>> depends on I2C
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile b/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
>> index 7ce790efad92..cb6138b8ded9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
>> @@ -30,3 +30,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ASPEED_BT_IPMI_BMC) += bt-bmc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ASPEED_KCS_IPMI_BMC) += kcs_bmc_aspeed.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_NPCM7XX_KCS_IPMI_BMC) += kcs_bmc_npcm7xx.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_IPMB_DEVICE_INTERFACE) += ipmb_dev_int.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SSIF_IPMI_BMC) += ssif_bmc.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..62db97773654
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,791 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>> +/*
>> + * The driver for BMC side of SSIF interface
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2022, Ampere Computing LLC
>> + *
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
>> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/poll.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>> +#include <linux/timer.h>
>> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
>> +
>> +#include "ssif_bmc.h"
>> +
>> +static const char *state_to_string(enum ssif_state state)
>> +{
>> + switch (state) {
>> + case SSIF_READY:
>> + return "SSIF_READY";
>> + case SSIF_START:
>> + return "SSIF_START";
>> + case SSIF_SMBUS_CMD:
>> + return "SSIF_SMBUS_CMD";
>> + case SSIF_REQ_RECVING:
>> + return "SSIF_REQ_RECVING";
>> + case SSIF_RES_SENDING:
>> + return "SSIF_RES_SENDING";
>> + case SSIF_BAD_SMBUS:
>> + return "SSIF_BAD_SMBUS";
>> + default:
>> + return "SSIF_STATE_UNKNOWN";
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Handle SSIF message that will be sent to user */
>> +static ssize_t ssif_bmc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>> +{
>> + struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
>> + struct ssif_msg msg;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + ssize_t ret;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> + while (!ssif_bmc->request_available) {
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> + if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
>> + return -EAGAIN;
>> + ret = wait_event_interruptible(ssif_bmc->wait_queue,
>> + ssif_bmc->request_available);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (count < min_t(ssize_t, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request), sizeof(struct ssif_msg))) {
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + } else {
>> + count = min_t(ssize_t, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request), sizeof(struct ssif_msg));
>> + memcpy(&msg, &ssif_bmc->request, count);
>> + ssif_bmc->request_available = false;
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + ret = copy_to_user(buf, &msg, count);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return (ret < 0) ? ret : count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Handle SSIF message that is written by user */
>> +static ssize_t ssif_bmc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, size_t count,
>> + loff_t *ppos)
>> +{
>> + struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
>> + struct ssif_msg msg;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + ssize_t ret;
>> +
>> + if (count > sizeof(struct ssif_msg))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + ret = copy_from_user(&msg, buf, count);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (!msg.len || count < ssif_msg_len(&msg))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> + while (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress) {
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> + if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
>> + return -EAGAIN;
>> + ret = wait_event_interruptible(ssif_bmc->wait_queue,
>> + !ssif_bmc->response_in_progress);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> + }
>> +
>> + memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response, &msg, count);
>> + ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read = (ssif_msg_len(&msg) <= MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION + 1);
>> +
>> + ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = true;
>> +
>> + /* ssif_bmc not busy */
>> + ssif_bmc->busy = false;
>> +
>> + if (ssif_bmc->response_timer_inited) {
>> + del_timer(&ssif_bmc->response_timer);
>> + ssif_bmc->response_timer_inited = false;
>> + }
>> + /* Clean old request buffer */
>> + memset(&ssif_bmc->request, 0, sizeof(struct ssif_msg));
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + return count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ssif_bmc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>> +{
>> + struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irq(&ssif_bmc->lock);
>> + if (!ssif_bmc->running)
>> + ssif_bmc->running = 1;
>> + else
>> + ret = -EBUSY;
>> + spin_unlock_irq(&ssif_bmc->lock);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static unsigned int ssif_bmc_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
>> +{
>> + struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
>> + unsigned int mask = 0;
>> +
>> + poll_wait(file, &ssif_bmc->wait_queue, wait);
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irq(&ssif_bmc->lock);
>> + /* The request is available, userspace application can get the request */
>> + if (ssif_bmc->request_available)
>> + mask |= POLLIN;
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irq(&ssif_bmc->lock);
>> +
>> + return mask;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ssif_bmc_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>> +{
>> + struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = to_ssif_bmc(file);
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irq(&ssif_bmc->lock);
>> + ssif_bmc->running = 0;
>> + spin_unlock_irq(&ssif_bmc->lock);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * System calls to device interface for user apps
>> + */
>> +static const struct file_operations ssif_bmc_fops = {
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + .open = ssif_bmc_open,
>> + .read = ssif_bmc_read,
>> + .write = ssif_bmc_write,
>> + .release = ssif_bmc_release,
>> + .poll = ssif_bmc_poll,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
>> +static void complete_response(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
>> +{
>> + /* Invalidate response in buffer to denote it having been sent. */
>> + ssif_bmc->response.len = 0;
>> + ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = false;
>> + ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed = 0;
>> + ssif_bmc->remain_len = 0;
>> + ssif_bmc->busy = false;
>> + memset(&ssif_bmc->response_buf, 0, MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION);
>> + wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void response_timeout(struct timer_list *t)
>> +{
>> + struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = from_timer(ssif_bmc, t, response_timer);
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>
> Is there a possible race here? The timeout can happen at the same time
> as a received message, will something bad happen if that's the case?
>
Thanks Corey,
I think I need extra comment here.
The purpose of this timeout is to make sure ssif_bmc will recover from
busy state in case the upper stack does not provide the response.
Hence, the response timeout is set as 500ms, twice the time of max
Request-to-Response in spec as the code below. Should it be longer?
As per spec, the max Request-to-Respose would not exceed 250ms.
I put the comment in ssif_bmc.h as below:
>> +/*
>> + * IPMI 2.0 Spec, section 12.7 SSIF Timing,
>> + * Request-to-Response Time is T6max(250ms) - T1max(20ms) - 3ms = 227ms
>> + * Recover ssif_bmc from busy state if it takes upto 500ms
>> + */
>> +#define RESPONSE_TIMEOUT 500 /* ms */
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + /* Recover ssif_bmc from busy */
>> + ssif_bmc->busy = false;
>> + del_timer(&ssif_bmc->response_timer);
>
> You don't need to delete the timer, it's in the timeout.
>
Will remove this redundant code in next version
>> + ssif_bmc->response_timer_inited = false;
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Called with ssif_bmc->lock held. */
>> +static void handle_request(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
>> +{
>> + /* set ssif_bmc to busy waiting for response */
>> + ssif_bmc->busy = true;
>> +
>> + /* Request message is available to process */
>> + ssif_bmc->request_available = true;
>> +
>> + /* Clean old response buffer */
>> + memset(&ssif_bmc->response, 0, sizeof(struct ssif_msg));
>> +
>> + /* This is the new READ request.*/
>> + wake_up_all(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
>> +
>> + /* Armed timer to recover slave from busy state in case of no response */
>> + if (!ssif_bmc->response_timer_inited) {
>> + timer_setup(&ssif_bmc->response_timer, response_timeout, 0);
>> + ssif_bmc->response_timer_inited = true;
>> + }
>> + mod_timer(&ssif_bmc->response_timer, jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(RESPONSE_TIMEOUT));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void set_multipart_response_buffer(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
>> +{
>> + u8 response_len = 0;
>> + int idx = 0;
>> + u8 data_len;
>> +
>> + data_len = ssif_bmc->response.len;
>> + switch (ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd) {
>> + case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_START:
>> + /*
>> + * Read Start length is 32 bytes.
>> + * Read Start transfer first 30 bytes of IPMI response
>> + * and 2 special code 0x00, 0x01.
>> + */
>> + *val = MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION;
>> + ssif_bmc->remain_len = data_len - MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_START_TRANSACTION;
>> + ssif_bmc->block_num = 0;
>
> Do you need to validate the data length before using this?
> This applies for lots of places through here.
>
set_multipart_response_buffer() is called only when ->is_singlepart_read
is false, which is determined by the below code under the *_write()
ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read = (ssif_msg_len(&msg) <=
MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION + 1);
So, I think the len is validated and could be use in this functions.
>> +
>> + ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = 0x00; /* Start Flag */
>> + ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = 0x01; /* Start Flag */
>> + ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->response.netfn_lun;
>> + ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->response.cmd;
>> + ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->response.payload[0];
>> +
>> + response_len = MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION - idx;
>> +
>> + memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx], &ssif_bmc->response.payload[1],
>> + response_len);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_MIDDLE:
>> + /*
>> + * IPMI READ Middle or READ End messages can carry up to 31 bytes
>> + * IPMI data plus block number byte.
>> + */
>> + if (ssif_bmc->remain_len < MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION) {
>> + /*
>> + * This is READ End message
>> + * Return length is the remaining response data length
>> + * plus block number
>> + * Block number 0xFF is to indicate this is last message
>> + *
>> + */
>> + *val = ssif_bmc->remain_len + 1;
>> + ssif_bmc->block_num = 0xFF;
>> + ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->block_num;
>> + response_len = ssif_bmc->remain_len;
>> + /* Clean the buffer */
>> + memset(&ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx], 0, MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION - idx);
>> + } else {
>> + /*
>> + * This is READ Middle message
>> + * Response length is the maximum SMBUS transfer length
>> + * Block number byte is incremented
>> + * Return length is maximum SMBUS transfer length
>> + */
>> + *val = MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION;
>> + ssif_bmc->remain_len -= MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION;
>> + response_len = MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION;
>> + ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx++] = ssif_bmc->block_num;
>> + ssif_bmc->block_num++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + memcpy(&ssif_bmc->response_buf[idx],
>> + ssif_bmc->response.payload + 1 + ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed,
>> + response_len);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + default:
>> + /* Do not expect to go to this case */
>> + dev_err(&ssif_bmc->client->dev,
>> + "%s: Unexpected SMBus command 0x%x\n",
>> + __func__, ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ssif_bmc->nbytes_processed += response_len;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Process the IPMI response that will be read by master */
>> +static void handle_read_processed(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
>> +{
>> + u8 *buf;
>> + u8 pec_len, addr, len;
>> + u8 pec = 0;
>> +
>> + pec_len = ssif_bmc->pec_support ? 1 : 0;
>> + /* PEC - Start Read Address */
>> + addr = GET_8BIT_ADDR(ssif_bmc->client->addr);
>> + pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &addr, 1);
>> + /* PEC - SSIF Command */
>> + pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd, 1);
>> + /* PEC - Restart Write Address */
>> + addr = addr | 0x01;
>> + pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &addr, 1);
>> +
>> + if (ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read) {
>> + /* Single-part Read processing */
>> + buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->response;
>> +
>> + if (ssif_bmc->response.len && ssif_bmc->msg_idx < ssif_bmc->response.len) {
>> + ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
>> + *val = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx];
>> + } else if (ssif_bmc->response.len && ssif_bmc->msg_idx == ssif_bmc->response.len) {
>> + ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
>> + *val = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, buf, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response));
>> + } else {
>
> I thought for a second that this was wrong, but I think it's correct.
> Supply zero if you don't have data.
>
>> + *val = 0;
>> + }
>> + /* Invalidate response buffer to denote it is sent */
>> + if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx + 1 >= (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->response) + pec_len))
>> + complete_response(ssif_bmc);
>> + } else {
>> + /* Multi-part Read processing */
>
> You don't check the length here like you did above. I think that's
> required.
>
As per my explanation above, the ->is_singlepart_read is determined by
testing the length, so it is validated as I assumed.
>> + switch (ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd) {
>> + case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_START:
>> + case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_MIDDLE:
>> + buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->response_buf;
>> + *val = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx];
>> + ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + /* Do not expect to go to this case */
>> + dev_err(&ssif_bmc->client->dev,
>> + "%s: Unexpected SMBus command 0x%x\n",
>> + __func__, ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + len = (ssif_bmc->block_num == 0xFF) ?
>> + ssif_bmc->remain_len + 1 : MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION;
>> + if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == (len + 1)) {
>> + pec = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, &len, 1);
>> + *val = i2c_smbus_pec(pec, ssif_bmc->response_buf, len);
>> + }
>> + /* Invalidate response buffer to denote last response is sent */
>> + if (ssif_bmc->block_num == 0xFF &&
>> + ssif_bmc->msg_idx > (ssif_bmc->remain_len + pec_len)) {
>> + complete_response(ssif_bmc);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void handle_write_received(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
>> +{
>> + u8 *buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->request;
>> +
>> + if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx >= sizeof(struct ssif_msg))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + switch (ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd) {
>> + case SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE:
>> + buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1] = *val;
>> + ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
>> +
>> + break;
>> + case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_START:
>> + if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == 1)
>> + ssif_bmc->request.len = 0;
>> +
>> + fallthrough;
>> + case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_MIDDLE:
>> + /* The len should always be 32 */
>> + if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == 1 && *val != MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION)
>> + dev_warn(&ssif_bmc->client->dev,
>> + "Warn: Invalid Multipart Write len");
>> +
>> + fallthrough;
>> + case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END:
>> + /* Multi-part write, 2nd byte received is length */
>> + if (ssif_bmc->msg_idx == 1) {
>> + if (*val > MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION)
>> + dev_warn(&ssif_bmc->client->dev,
>> + "Warn: Invalid Multipart Write End len");
>> +
>> + ssif_bmc->request.len += *val;
>> + ssif_bmc->recv_len = *val;
>> +
>> + /* request len should never exceeded 255 bytes */
>> + if (ssif_bmc->request.len > 255)
>> + dev_warn(&ssif_bmc->client->dev,
>> + "Warn: Invalid request len");
>> +
>> + } else {
>
> You check msg_idx above, but I'm not sure that check will cover this
> operation.
>
That check is to make sure the length (*val) must always be strictly 32
bytes in case of MULTIPART_WRITE_START/MIDDLE. And this check allows the
length is up to 32 bytes in MULTIPART_WRITE_END.
>> + buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1 +
>> + ssif_bmc->request.len - ssif_bmc->recv_len] = *val;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
>> +
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + /* Do not expect to go to this case */
>> + dev_err(&ssif_bmc->client->dev,
>> + "%s: Unexpected SMBus command 0x%x\n",
>> + __func__, ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool validate_request(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc)
>> +{
>> + u8 rpec = 0, cpec = 0;
>> + bool ret = true;
>> + u8 addr, index;
>> + u8 *buf;
>> +
>
> Is there any length validation for using buf below? It looks like you
> are accessing without checking length, but maybe I missed something.
>
Yes, there is length testing for each part before using buf to calculate
PEC as in the "if" below.
>> + buf = (u8 *)&ssif_bmc->request;
>> + switch (ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd) {
>> + case SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE:
>> + if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1) == ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request)) {
>> + /* PEC is not included */
>> + ssif_bmc->pec_support = false;
>> + ret = true;
>> + goto exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1) != (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request) + 1)) {
>> + dev_err(&ssif_bmc->client->dev, "Error: Unexpected length received %d\n",
>> + ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
>> + ret = false;
>> + goto exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* PEC is included */
>> + ssif_bmc->pec_support = true;
>> + rpec = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 2];
>> + addr = GET_8BIT_ADDR(ssif_bmc->client->addr);
>> + cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &addr, 1);
>> + cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd, 1);
>> + cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, buf, ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
>> + if (rpec != cpec) {
>> + dev_err(&ssif_bmc->client->dev, "Bad PEC 0x%02x vs. 0x%02x\n", rpec, cpec);
>> + ret = false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + break;
>> + case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_START:
>> + case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_MIDDLE:
>> + case SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END:
>> + index = ssif_bmc->request.len - ssif_bmc->recv_len;
>> + if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1 + index) == ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request)) {
>> + /* PEC is not included */
>> + ssif_bmc->pec_support = false;
>> + ret = true;
>> + goto exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if ((ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 1 + index) != (ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request) + 1)) {
>> + dev_err(&ssif_bmc->client->dev, "Error: Unexpected length received %d\n",
>> + ssif_msg_len(&ssif_bmc->request));
>> + ret = false;
>> + goto exit;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* PEC is included */
>> + ssif_bmc->pec_support = true;
>> + rpec = buf[ssif_bmc->msg_idx - 2 + index];
>> + addr = GET_8BIT_ADDR(ssif_bmc->client->addr);
>> + cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &addr, 1);
>> + cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd, 1);
>> + cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, &ssif_bmc->recv_len, 1);
>
> Just curious, I'm not sure the client side PEC in the Linux driver has
> ever been validated. Have you tested both sides?
>
Yes, we found that request from host has an extra byte for PEC and that
is why we added PEC support.
>> + /* As SMBus specification does not allow the length
>> + * (byte count) in the Write-Block protocol to be zero.
>> + * Therefore, it is illegal to have the last Middle
>> + * transaction in the sequence carry 32-byte and have
>> + * a length of ‘0’ in the End transaction.
>> + * But some users may try to use this way and we should
>> + * prevent ssif_bmc driver broken in this case.
>> + */
>> + if (ssif_bmc->recv_len != 0)
>> + cpec = i2c_smbus_pec(cpec, buf + 1 + index, ssif_bmc->recv_len);
>> +
>> + if (rpec != cpec) {
>> + dev_err(&ssif_bmc->client->dev, "Bad PEC 0x%02x vs. 0x%02x\n", rpec, cpec);
>> + ret = false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + /* Do not expect to go to this case */
>> + dev_err(&ssif_bmc->client->dev, "%s: Unexpected SMBus command 0x%x\n",
>> + __func__, ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd);
>> + ret = false;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> +exit:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Just a nit, more a general coding style comment. It's almost always a
> bad idea to put a negative (unsupported) into a check function. You
> often end up with something like:
>
> if (!unsupported_smbus_cmd(c))....
>
> which looks a little strange. Double negatives can make it hard to
> follow and lead to mistakes. This one isn't too bad, but sometimes it
> can be. It's better to do:
>
> if (supported_smbus_cmd(c))....
> or
> if (!supported_smbus_cmd(c))....
>
>
Thanks, Corey. I'll try to refactor this part in next version.
>> +static bool unsupported_smbus_cmd(u8 cmd)
>> +{
>> + if (cmd == SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_READ ||
>> + cmd == SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE ||
>> + cmd == SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_START ||
>> + cmd == SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_MIDDLE ||
>> + cmd == SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END ||
>> + cmd == SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_START ||
>> + cmd == SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_MIDDLE)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void process_smbus_cmd(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
>> +{
>> + /* SMBUS command can vary (single or multi-part) */
>> + ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd = *val;
>> + ssif_bmc->msg_idx++;
>> +
>> + if (unsupported_smbus_cmd(*val))
>> + dev_warn(&ssif_bmc->client->dev, "Warn: Unknown SMBus command");
>> +
>> + if (*val == SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE ||
>> + *val == SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_START) {
>> + /*
>> + * The response maybe not come in-time, causing host SSIF driver
>> + * to timeout and resend a new request. In such case check for
>> + * pending response and clear it
>> + */
>> + if (ssif_bmc->response_in_progress)
>> + complete_response(ssif_bmc);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void on_read_requested_event(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
>> +{
>> + if (ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_READY ||
>> + ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_START ||
>> + ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_REQ_RECVING ||
>> + ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_RES_SENDING) {
>> + ssif_bmc->state = SSIF_BAD_SMBUS;
>> + dev_warn(&ssif_bmc->client->dev,
>> + "Warn: %s unexpected READ REQUESTED in state=%s\n",
>> + __func__, state_to_string(ssif_bmc->state));
>> +
>> + } else if (ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_SMBUS_CMD) {
>> + ssif_bmc->state = SSIF_RES_SENDING;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ssif_bmc->msg_idx = 0;
>> + if (ssif_bmc->is_singlepart_read)
>> + *val = ssif_bmc->response.len;
>> + else
>> + set_multipart_response_buffer(ssif_bmc, val);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void on_read_processed_event(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
>> +{
>> + if (ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_READY ||
>> + ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_START ||
>> + ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_REQ_RECVING ||
>> + ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_SMBUS_CMD) {
>> + dev_warn(&ssif_bmc->client->dev,
>> + "Warn: %s unexpected READ PROCESSED in state=%s\n",
>> + __func__, state_to_string(ssif_bmc->state));
>> + ssif_bmc->state = SSIF_BAD_SMBUS;
>> + }
>> +
>> + handle_read_processed(ssif_bmc, val);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void on_write_requested_event(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
>> +{
>> + ssif_bmc->msg_idx = 0;
>> +
>> + if (ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_READY || ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_SMBUS_CMD) {
>> + ssif_bmc->state = SSIF_START;
>> +
>> + } else if (ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_START ||
>> + ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_REQ_RECVING ||
>> + ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_RES_SENDING) {
>> + dev_warn(&ssif_bmc->client->dev,
>> + "Warn: %s unexpected WRITE REQUEST in state=%s\n",
>> + __func__, state_to_string(ssif_bmc->state));
>> + ssif_bmc->state = SSIF_BAD_SMBUS;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void on_write_received_event(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
>> +{
>> + if (ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_READY || ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_RES_SENDING) {
>> + dev_warn(&ssif_bmc->client->dev,
>> + "Warn: %s unexpected WRITE RECEIVED in state=%s\n",
>> + __func__, state_to_string(ssif_bmc->state));
>> + ssif_bmc->state = SSIF_BAD_SMBUS;
>> + } else if (ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_START) {
>> + ssif_bmc->state = SSIF_SMBUS_CMD;
>> + } else if (ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_SMBUS_CMD) {
>> + ssif_bmc->state = SSIF_REQ_RECVING;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* This is response sending state */
>> + if (ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_REQ_RECVING)
>> + handle_write_received(ssif_bmc, val);
>> + else if (ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_SMBUS_CMD)
>> + process_smbus_cmd(ssif_bmc, val);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void on_stop_event(struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc, u8 *val)
>> +{
>> + if (ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_READY ||
>> + ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_START ||
>> + ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_SMBUS_CMD) {
>> + dev_warn(&ssif_bmc->client->dev,
>> + "Warn: %s unexpected SLAVE STOP in state=%s\n",
>> + __func__, state_to_string(ssif_bmc->state));
>> +
>> + } else if (ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_BAD_SMBUS) {
>> + dev_warn(&ssif_bmc->client->dev,
>> + "Warn: %s received SLAVE STOP from bad state=%s\n",
>> + __func__, state_to_string(ssif_bmc->state));
>> +
>> + } else if (ssif_bmc->state == SSIF_REQ_RECVING) {
>> + /* A BMC that receives an invalid request drop the data for the write
>> + * transaction and any further transactions (read or write) until
>> + * the next valid read or write Start transaction is received
>> + */
>> + if (!validate_request(ssif_bmc))
>> + dev_err(&ssif_bmc->client->dev, "Error: invalid pec\n");
>> + else if (ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd == SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE ||
>> + ssif_bmc->smbus_cmd == SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END)
>> + handle_request(ssif_bmc);
>> + }
>> +
>> + ssif_bmc->state = SSIF_READY;
>> + /* Reset message index */
>> + ssif_bmc->msg_idx = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Callback function to handle I2C slave events
>> + */
>> +static int ssif_bmc_cb(struct i2c_client *client, enum i2c_slave_event event, u8 *val)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + switch (event) {
>> + case I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED:
>> + on_read_requested_event(ssif_bmc, val);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED:
>> + on_write_requested_event(ssif_bmc, val);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case I2C_SLAVE_READ_PROCESSED:
>> + on_read_processed_event(ssif_bmc, val);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED:
>> + on_write_received_event(ssif_bmc, val);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case I2C_SLAVE_STOP:
>> + on_stop_event(ssif_bmc, val);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + default:
>> + dev_warn(&ssif_bmc->client->dev, "Warn: Unknown i2c slave event\n");
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (ssif_bmc->busy)
>> + ret = -EBUSY;
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ssif_bmc->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ssif_bmc_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> +{
>> + struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ssif_bmc = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*ssif_bmc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!ssif_bmc)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_init(&ssif_bmc->lock);
>> +
>> + init_waitqueue_head(&ssif_bmc->wait_queue);
>> + ssif_bmc->request_available = false;
>> + ssif_bmc->response_in_progress = false;
>> + ssif_bmc->busy = false;
>> + ssif_bmc->response_timer_inited = false;
>> +
>> + /* Register misc device interface */
>> + ssif_bmc->miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
>> + ssif_bmc->miscdev.name = DEVICE_NAME;
>> + ssif_bmc->miscdev.fops = &ssif_bmc_fops;
>> + ssif_bmc->miscdev.parent = &client->dev;
>> + ret = misc_register(&ssif_bmc->miscdev);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + ssif_bmc->client = client;
>> + ssif_bmc->client->flags |= I2C_CLIENT_SLAVE;
>> +
>> + /* Register I2C slave */
>> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, ssif_bmc);
>> + ret = i2c_slave_register(client, ssif_bmc_cb);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + misc_deregister(&ssif_bmc->miscdev);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +out:
>> + devm_kfree(&client->dev, ssif_bmc);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ssif_bmc_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> + struct ssif_bmc_ctx *ssif_bmc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> +
>> + i2c_slave_unregister(client);
>> + misc_deregister(&ssif_bmc->miscdev);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id ssif_bmc_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "ampere,ssif-bmc" },
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct i2c_device_id ssif_bmc_id[] = {
>> + { DEVICE_NAME, 0 },
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ssif_bmc_id);
>> +
>> +static struct i2c_driver ssif_bmc_driver = {
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = DEVICE_NAME,
>> + .of_match_table = ssif_bmc_match,
>> + },
>> + .probe = ssif_bmc_probe,
>> + .remove = ssif_bmc_remove,
>> + .id_table = ssif_bmc_id,
>> +};
>> +
>> +module_i2c_driver(ssif_bmc_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Quan Nguyen <quan@...amperecomputing.com>");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Chuong Tran <chuong@...amperecomputing.com>");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Linux device driver of the BMC IPMI SSIF interface.");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..9a26f3c252cc
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ssif_bmc.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
>> +/*
>> + * The driver for BMC side of SSIF interface
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2022, Ampere Computing LLC
>> + *
>> + */
>> +#ifndef __SSIF_BMC_H__
>> +#define __SSIF_BMC_H__
>> +
>> +#define DEVICE_NAME "ipmi-ssif-host"
>> +
>> +#define GET_8BIT_ADDR(addr_7bit) (((addr_7bit) << 1) & 0xff)
>> +
>> +/* A standard SMBus Transaction is limited to 32 data bytes */
>> +#define MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION 32
>> +
>> +#define MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_START_TRANSACTION 30
>> +#define MAX_IPMI_DATA_PER_MIDDLE_TRANSACTION 31
>> +
>> +#define SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_WRITE 0x2
>> +#define SSIF_IPMI_SINGLEPART_READ 0x3
>> +#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_START 0x6
>> +#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_MIDDLE 0x7
>> +#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_WRITE_END 0x8
>> +#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_START 0x3
>> +#define SSIF_IPMI_MULTIPART_READ_MIDDLE 0x9
>> +
>> +#define MSG_PAYLOAD_LEN_MAX 252
>> +/*
>> + * IPMI 2.0 Spec, section 12.7 SSIF Timing,
>> + * Request-to-Response Time is T6max(250ms) - T1max(20ms) - 3ms = 227ms
>> + * Recover ssif_bmc from busy state if it takes upto 500ms
>> + */
>> +#define RESPONSE_TIMEOUT 500 /* ms */
>> +
>> +struct ssif_msg {
>> + u8 len;
>> + u8 netfn_lun;
>> + u8 cmd;
>> + u8 payload[MSG_PAYLOAD_LEN_MAX];
>> +} __packed;
>> +
>> +static inline u32 ssif_msg_len(struct ssif_msg *ssif_msg)
>> +{
>> + return ssif_msg->len + 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * SSIF internal states:
>> + * SSIF_READY 0x00 : Ready state
>> + * SSIF_START 0x01 : Start smbus transaction
>> + * SSIF_SMBUS_CMD 0x02 : Received SMBus command
>> + * SSIF_REQ_RECVING 0x03 : Receiving request
>> + * SSIF_RES_SENDING 0x04 : Sending response
>> + * SSIF_BAD_SMBUS 0x05 : Bad SMbus transaction
>> + */
>> +enum ssif_state {
>> + SSIF_READY,
>> + SSIF_START,
>> + SSIF_SMBUS_CMD,
>> + SSIF_REQ_RECVING,
>> + SSIF_RES_SENDING,
>> + SSIF_BAD_SMBUS,
>> + SSIF_STATE_MAX
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct ssif_bmc_ctx {
>> + struct i2c_client *client;
>> + struct miscdevice miscdev;
>> + size_t msg_idx;
>> + bool pec_support;
>> + /* ssif bmc spinlock */
>> + spinlock_t lock;
>> + wait_queue_head_t wait_queue;
>> + u8 running;
>> + enum ssif_state state;
>> + u8 smbus_cmd;
>> + /* Timeout waiting for response */
>> + struct timer_list response_timer;
>> + bool response_timer_inited;
>> + /* Flag to identify a Multi-part Read Transaction */
>> + bool is_singlepart_read;
>> + u8 nbytes_processed;
>> + u8 remain_len;
>> + u8 recv_len;
>> + /* Block Number of a Multi-part Read Transaction */
>> + u8 block_num;
>> + bool request_available;
>> + bool response_in_progress;
>> + bool busy;
>> + /* Response buffer for Multi-part Read Transaction */
>> + u8 response_buf[MAX_PAYLOAD_PER_TRANSACTION];
>> + struct ssif_msg response;
>> + struct ssif_msg request;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static inline struct ssif_bmc_ctx *to_ssif_bmc(struct file *file)
>> +{
>> + return container_of(file->private_data, struct ssif_bmc_ctx, miscdev);
>> +}
>> +#endif /* __SSIF_BMC_H__ */
>> --
>> 2.35.1
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists