linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v6 3/6] fpga: dfl: check released_port_num and num

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5483011FA979497ECE41915FE3129@BN9PR11MB5483.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Mar 2022 09:02:26 +0000
From:   "Zhang, Tianfei" <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>
To:     "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>, "trix@...hat.com" <trix@...hat.com>,
        "mdf@...nel.org" <mdf@...nel.org>,
        "Xu, Yilun" <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
        "linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>
CC:     "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
        Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 3/6] fpga: dfl: check released_port_num and num_vfs for
 legacy model



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2022 4:49 PM
> To: Zhang, Tianfei <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>; trix@...hat.com;
> mdf@...nel.org; Xu, Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>; linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> rdunlap@...radead.org
> Cc: corbet@....net; Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 3/6] fpga: dfl: check released_port_num and num_vfs for
> legacy model
> 
> > Subject: [PATCH v6 3/6] fpga: dfl: check released_port_num and num_vfs
> > for legacy model
> >
> > From: Tianfei zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>
> >
> > In OFS legacy model, there is 1:1 mapping for Port device and VF, so
> > it need to check the number of released port match the number of VFs
> > or not. But in "Multiple VFs per PR slot" model, there is 1:N mapping
> > for the Port device and VFs.
> 
> The title and commit message seems not matching the code..
> From code it sounds like we are trying to skip the PORT (PF access-> VF access)
> function, as new SRIOV usage model is introduced.
> Probably we can skip it early in this function or even skip this function directly. It
> doesn't matter it's 1:N or 1:1, we always want to keep PF access to port, right?

For 1:1, there is 1 port mapping the 1 VFs, and we check the num_vfs was equal  with released ports or not.
But for 1:N, it break this checking.

> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tianfei zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/fpga/dfl.c | 10 ++++++----
> >  drivers/fpga/dfl.h |  2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c index
> > 712c53363fda..b95b29c5c81d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> > @@ -1707,11 +1707,13 @@ int dfl_fpga_cdev_config_ports_vf(struct
> > dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev, int num_vfs)
> >
> >  	mutex_lock(&cdev->lock);
> >  	/*
> > -	 * can't turn multiple ports into 1 VF device, only 1 port for 1 VF
> > -	 * device, so if released port number doesn't match VF device number,
> > -	 * then reject the request with -EINVAL error code.
> > +	 * In the OFS legacy model, it can't turn multiple ports into 1 VF
> > +	 * device, because only 1 port conneced to 1 VF device, so if released
> > +	 * port number doesn't match VF device number, then reject the request
> > +	 * with -EINVAL error code.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (cdev->released_port_num != num_vfs) {
> > +	if ((dfl_has_port_connected_afu(cdev) &&
> 
> Could we really use this as indication for which SRIOV model of hardware?
> 
> > +	     cdev->released_port_num != num_vfs)) {
> >  		ret = -EINVAL;
> >  		goto done;
> >  	}
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.h b/drivers/fpga/dfl.h index
> > bc56b7e8c01b..83c2c50975e5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.h
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.h
> > @@ -471,6 +471,8 @@ void dfl_fpga_enum_info_free(struct
> > dfl_fpga_enum_info *info);  #define DFL_PORT_CONNECT_BITS
> > MAX_DFL_FPGA_PORT_NUM  #define DFL_FEAT_PORT_CONNECT_MASK
> ((1UL <<
> > (DFL_PORT_CONNECT_BITS)) - 1)
> >
> > +#define dfl_has_port_connected_afu(cdev) ((cdev)->flags &
> > DFL_FEAT_PORT_CONNECT_MASK)
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * struct dfl_fpga_cdev - container device of DFL based FPGA
> >   *
> > --
> > 2.26.2