| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFA6WYPYE1Ggs+6GB5Z9aMVcFjrS8mOm4LbggBocti+Yvz8idA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 17:10:09 +0530
From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] optee: add OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 at 13:47, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Sumit,
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:00:25PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > Hi Jens,
> >
> > Firstly apologies for the late review as this patch-set was in my
> > queue but got distracted to other high priority activities.
>
> No worries, your comments are very welcome.
>
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 01:18, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Adds OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG where the struct optee_msg_arg to be
> > > used for RPC is appended in the memory following the normal argument
> > > struct optee_msg_arg. This is an optimization to avoid caching the RPC
> > > argument struct while still maintaining similar performance as if it
> > > was cached.
> > >
> > > The presence OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG is indicated by the new
> > > OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_RPC_ARG bit returned by
> > > OPTEE_SMC_EXCHANGE_CAPABILITIES. OPTEE_SMC_EXCHANGE_CAPABILITIES also
> > > reports the number of arguments that the RPC argument struct must have
> > > room for.
> > >
> > > OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG and OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_ARG can be used
> > > interleaved with difference that when OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG is
> > > used the RPC argument struct to be used is the one appended to the
> > > normal argument struct.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 6 +--
> > > drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c | 10 ++--
> > > drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 4 +-
> > > drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h | 47 ++++++++++++++---
> > > drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > 5 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/call.c b/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
> > > index bd49ec934060..82d836df6922 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/call.c
> > > @@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ struct tee_shm *optee_get_msg_arg(struct tee_context *ctx, size_t num_params,
> > > * the RPC argument struct if a second MSG arg struct is expected.
> > > * The second arg struct will then be used for RPC.
> > > */
> > > - if (optee->rpc_arg_count)
> > > - sz += OPTEE_MSG_GET_ARG_SIZE(optee->rpc_arg_count);
> > > + if (optee->rpc_param_count)
> > > + sz += OPTEE_MSG_GET_ARG_SIZE(optee->rpc_param_count);
> >
> > nit: I see this renaming as part of this new feature patch-set. Can we
> > split it as a separate patch which would be helpful for review?
>
> OK, I'll separate that in the v2.
>
> >
> > >
> > > shm = tee_shm_alloc_priv_buf(ctx, sz);
> > > if (IS_ERR(shm))
> > > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ struct tee_shm *optee_get_msg_arg(struct tee_context *ctx, size_t num_params,
> > > return (void *)ma;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - memset(ma, 0, OPTEE_MSG_GET_ARG_SIZE(num_params));
> > > + memset(ma, 0, sz);
> > > ma->num_params = num_params;
> > > *msg_arg = ma;
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c
> > > index a5eb4ef46971..7686f7020616 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c
> > > @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static bool optee_ffa_api_is_compatbile(struct ffa_device *ffa_dev,
> > >
> > > static bool optee_ffa_exchange_caps(struct ffa_device *ffa_dev,
> > > const struct ffa_dev_ops *ops,
> > > - unsigned int *rpc_arg_count)
> > > + unsigned int *rpc_param_count)
> > > {
> > > struct ffa_send_direct_data data = { OPTEE_FFA_EXCHANGE_CAPABILITIES };
> > > int rc;
> > > @@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ static bool optee_ffa_exchange_caps(struct ffa_device *ffa_dev,
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - *rpc_arg_count = (u8)data.data1;
> > > + *rpc_param_count = (u8)data.data1;
> > >
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > > @@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ static void optee_ffa_remove(struct ffa_device *ffa_dev)
> > > static int optee_ffa_probe(struct ffa_device *ffa_dev)
> > > {
> > > const struct ffa_dev_ops *ffa_ops;
> > > - unsigned int rpc_arg_count;
> > > + unsigned int rpc_param_count;
> > > struct tee_shm_pool *pool;
> > > struct tee_device *teedev;
> > > struct tee_context *ctx;
> > > @@ -788,7 +788,7 @@ static int optee_ffa_probe(struct ffa_device *ffa_dev)
> > > if (!optee_ffa_api_is_compatbile(ffa_dev, ffa_ops))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > - if (!optee_ffa_exchange_caps(ffa_dev, ffa_ops, &rpc_arg_count))
> > > + if (!optee_ffa_exchange_caps(ffa_dev, ffa_ops, &rpc_param_count))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > optee = kzalloc(sizeof(*optee), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > @@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ static int optee_ffa_probe(struct ffa_device *ffa_dev)
> > > optee->ops = &optee_ffa_ops;
> > > optee->ffa.ffa_dev = ffa_dev;
> > > optee->ffa.ffa_ops = ffa_ops;
> > > - optee->rpc_arg_count = rpc_arg_count;
> > > + optee->rpc_param_count = rpc_param_count;
> > >
> > > teedev = tee_device_alloc(&optee_ffa_clnt_desc, NULL, optee->pool,
> > > optee);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > > index e77765c78878..e80c5d9b62ec 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ struct optee_ops {
> > > * @notif: notification synchronization struct
> > > * @supp: supplicant synchronization struct for RPC to supplicant
> > > * @pool: shared memory pool
> > > - * @rpc_arg_count: If > 0 number of RPC parameters to make room for
> > > + * @rpc_param_count: If > 0 number of RPC parameters to make room for
> > > * @scan_bus_done flag if device registation was already done.
> > > * @scan_bus_wq workqueue to scan optee bus and register optee drivers
> > > * @scan_bus_work workq to scan optee bus and register optee drivers
> > > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ struct optee {
> > > struct optee_notif notif;
> > > struct optee_supp supp;
> > > struct tee_shm_pool *pool;
> > > - unsigned int rpc_arg_count;
> > > + unsigned int rpc_param_count;
> > > bool scan_bus_done;
> > > struct workqueue_struct *scan_bus_wq;
> > > struct work_struct scan_bus_work;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h
> > > index d44a6ae994f8..378741a459b6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h
> > > @@ -107,14 +107,22 @@ struct optee_smc_call_get_os_revision_result {
> > > /*
> > > * Call with struct optee_msg_arg as argument
> > > *
> > > - * When calling this function normal world has a few responsibilities:
> > > + * When called with OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG or
> > > + * OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG in a0 there is one RPC struct optee_msg_arg
> > > + * following after the first struct optee_msg_arg. The RPC struct
> > > + * optee_msg_arg has reserved space for the number of RPC parameters as
> > > + * returned by OPTEE_SMC_EXCHANGE_CAPABILITIES.
> > > + *
> > > + * When calling these functions normal world has a few responsibilities:
> > > * 1. It must be able to handle eventual RPCs
> > > * 2. Non-secure interrupts should not be masked
> > > * 3. If asynchronous notifications has been negotiated successfully, then
> > > - * asynchronous notifications should be unmasked during this call.
> > > + * the interrupt for asynchronous notifications should be unmasked
> > > + * during this call.
> > > *
> > > - * Call register usage:
> > > - * a0 SMC Function ID, OPTEE_SMC*CALL_WITH_ARG
> > > + * Call register usage, OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_ARG and
> > > + * OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG:
> > > + * a0 SMC Function ID, OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_ARG or OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG
> > > * a1 Upper 32 bits of a 64-bit physical pointer to a struct optee_msg_arg
> > > * a2 Lower 32 bits of a 64-bit physical pointer to a struct optee_msg_arg
> > > * a3 Cache settings, not used if physical pointer is in a predefined shared
> > > @@ -122,6 +130,15 @@ struct optee_smc_call_get_os_revision_result {
> > > * a4-6 Not used
> > > * a7 Hypervisor Client ID register
> > > *
> > > + * Call register usage, OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG:
> >
> > Although I didn't see any reference to OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG in
> > the commit message, but do we really need to introduce it? Wouldn't it
> > be possible to just pass additional "shared memory cookie" value as
> > part of "Not used" (a4-6) arguments?
>
> I'll update the commit message to mention OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG
> too. I think it's more clear with a separate ID for this, less risk of
> confusion.
IMO, it would unnecessarily complicate and introduce ambiguity in the
ABI as after this patch we will have:
CALL_WITH_ARG: Standard arguments *without* pre-allocated RPC arguments buffer
CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG: Standard arguments *with* pre-allocated RPC arguments buffer
CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG: Registered arguments but *not* explicit whether
RPC arguments buffer is there or not.
If we keep the ABI simplified to say we only support two types of
invocation irrespective of whether the arguments are allocated from
statically shared memory or dynamically shared memory:
CALL_WITH_ARG: Standard arguments *without* pre-allocated RPC arguments buffer
CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG: Standard arguments *with* pre-allocated RPC arguments buffer
> How would the callee know if it's the cookie or the physical
> address it should use? Whatever we do, we're extenting the ABI.
>
Isn't it possible for OP-TEE to determine if it's a valid cookie or
not which will be passed into currently unused arguments?
-Sumit
> >
> > > + * a0 SMC Function ID, OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG
> > > + * a1 Upper 32 bits of a 64-bit shared memory cookie
> > > + * a2 Lower 32 bits of a 64-bit shared memory cookie
> > > + * a3 Offset of the struct optee_msg_arg in the shared memory with the
> > > + * supplied cookie
> > > + * a4-6 Not used
> > > + * a7 Hypervisor Client ID register
> > > + *
> > > * Normal return register usage:
> > > * a0 Return value, OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_*
> > > * a1-3 Not used
> > > @@ -154,6 +171,10 @@ struct optee_smc_call_get_os_revision_result {
> > > #define OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_WITH_ARG OPTEE_MSG_FUNCID_CALL_WITH_ARG
> > > #define OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_ARG \
> > > OPTEE_SMC_STD_CALL_VAL(OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_WITH_ARG)
> > > +#define OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG \
> > > + OPTEE_SMC_STD_CALL_VAL(OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG)
> > > +#define OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG \
> > > + OPTEE_SMC_STD_CALL_VAL(OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG)
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Get Shared Memory Config
> > > @@ -202,6 +223,10 @@ struct optee_smc_get_shm_config_result {
> > > * a0 OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_OK
> > > * a1 bitfield of secure world capabilities OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_*
> > > * a2 The maximum secure world notification number
> > > + * a3 Bit[7:0]: Number of parameters needed for RPC to be supplied
> > > + * as the second MSG arg struct for
> > > + * OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_ARG
> > > + * Bit[31:8]: Reserved (MBZ)
> > > * a3-7 Preserved
> > > *
> > > * Error return register usage:
> > > @@ -215,7 +240,6 @@ struct optee_smc_get_shm_config_result {
> > > #define OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_HAVE_RESERVED_SHM BIT(0)
> > > /* Secure world can communicate via previously unregistered shared memory */
> > > #define OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_UNREGISTERED_SHM BIT(1)
> > > -
> > > /*
> > > * Secure world supports commands "register/unregister shared memory",
> > > * secure world accepts command buffers located in any parts of non-secure RAM
> > > @@ -227,6 +251,8 @@ struct optee_smc_get_shm_config_result {
> > > #define OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_MEMREF_NULL BIT(4)
> > > /* Secure world supports asynchronous notification of normal world */
> > > #define OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_ASYNC_NOTIF BIT(5)
> > > +/* Secure world supports pre-allocating RPC arg struct */
> > > +#define OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_RPC_ARG BIT(6)
> > >
> > > #define OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_EXCHANGE_CAPABILITIES 9
> > > #define OPTEE_SMC_EXCHANGE_CAPABILITIES \
> > > @@ -236,7 +262,7 @@ struct optee_smc_exchange_capabilities_result {
> > > unsigned long status;
> > > unsigned long capabilities;
> > > unsigned long max_notif_value;
> > > - unsigned long reserved0;
> > > + unsigned long data;
> > > };
> > >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -358,6 +384,9 @@ struct optee_smc_disable_shm_cache_result {
> > > * should be called until all pended values have been retrieved. When a
> > > * value is retrieved, it's cleared from the record in secure world.
> > > *
> > > + * It is expected that this function is called from an interrupt handler
> > > + * in normal world.
> > > + *
> > > * Call requests usage:
> > > * a0 SMC Function ID, OPTEE_SMC_GET_ASYNC_NOTIF_VALUE
> > > * a1-6 Not used
> > > @@ -390,6 +419,12 @@ struct optee_smc_disable_shm_cache_result {
> > > #define OPTEE_SMC_GET_ASYNC_NOTIF_VALUE \
> > > OPTEE_SMC_FAST_CALL_VAL(OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_GET_ASYNC_NOTIF_VALUE)
> > >
> > > +/* See OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG above */
> > > +#define OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG 18
> > > +
> > > +/* See OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG above */
> > > +#define OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG 19
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * Resume from RPC (for example after processing a foreign interrupt)
> > > *
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> > > index 67b7f7d2ff27..c45cc9b7e5a7 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> > > @@ -732,16 +732,9 @@ static void optee_rpc_finalize_call(struct optee_call_ctx *call_ctx)
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void handle_rpc_func_cmd(struct tee_context *ctx, struct optee *optee,
> > > - struct tee_shm *shm,
> > > + struct optee_msg_arg *arg,
> > > struct optee_call_ctx *call_ctx)
> > > {
> > > - struct optee_msg_arg *arg;
> > > -
> > > - arg = tee_shm_get_va(shm, 0);
> > > - if (IS_ERR(arg)) {
> > > - pr_err("%s: tee_shm_get_va %p failed\n", __func__, shm);
> > > - return;
> > > - }
> > >
> > > switch (arg->cmd) {
> > > case OPTEE_RPC_CMD_SHM_ALLOC:
> > > @@ -765,11 +758,13 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd(struct tee_context *ctx, struct optee *optee,
> > > * Result of RPC is written back into @param.
> > > */
> > > static void optee_handle_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > > + struct optee_msg_arg *rpc_arg,
> > > struct optee_rpc_param *param,
> > > struct optee_call_ctx *call_ctx)
> > > {
> > > struct tee_device *teedev = ctx->teedev;
> > > struct optee *optee = tee_get_drvdata(teedev);
> > > + struct optee_msg_arg *arg;
> > > struct tee_shm *shm;
> > > phys_addr_t pa;
> > >
> > > @@ -801,8 +796,19 @@ static void optee_handle_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > > */
> > > break;
> > > case OPTEE_SMC_RPC_FUNC_CMD:
> > > - shm = reg_pair_to_ptr(param->a1, param->a2);
> > > - handle_rpc_func_cmd(ctx, optee, shm, call_ctx);
> > > + if (rpc_arg) {
> > > + arg = rpc_arg;
> > > + } else {
> > > + shm = reg_pair_to_ptr(param->a1, param->a2);
> > > + arg = tee_shm_get_va(shm, 0);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(arg)) {
> > > + pr_err("%s: tee_shm_get_va %p failed\n",
> > > + __func__, shm);
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + handle_rpc_func_cmd(ctx, optee, arg, call_ctx);
> > > break;
> > > default:
> > > pr_warn("Unknown RPC func 0x%x\n",
> > > @@ -816,7 +822,7 @@ static void optee_handle_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > > /**
> > > * optee_smc_do_call_with_arg() - Do an SMC to OP-TEE in secure world
> > > * @ctx: calling context
> > > - * @arg: shared memory holding the message to pass to secure world
> > > + * @shm: shared memory holding the message to pass to secure world
> > > *
> > > * Does and SMC to OP-TEE in secure world and handles eventual resulting
> > > * Remote Procedure Calls (RPC) from OP-TEE.
> > > @@ -824,21 +830,46 @@ static void optee_handle_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > > * Returns return code from secure world, 0 is OK
> > > */
> > > static int optee_smc_do_call_with_arg(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > > - struct tee_shm *arg)
> > > + struct tee_shm *shm)
> > > {
> > > struct optee *optee = tee_get_drvdata(ctx->teedev);
> > > struct optee_call_waiter w;
> > > struct optee_rpc_param param = { };
> > > struct optee_call_ctx call_ctx = { };
> > > - phys_addr_t parg;
> > > + struct optee_msg_arg *rpc_arg = NULL;
> > > int rc;
> > >
> > > - rc = tee_shm_get_pa(arg, 0, &parg);
> > > - if (rc)
> > > - return rc;
> > > + if (optee->rpc_param_count) {
> > > + struct optee_msg_arg *arg;
> > > + unsigned int rpc_arg_offs;
> > >
> > > - param.a0 = OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_ARG;
> > > - reg_pair_from_64(¶m.a1, ¶m.a2, parg);
> > > + arg = tee_shm_get_va(shm, 0);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(arg))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(arg);
> > > +
> > > + rpc_arg_offs = OPTEE_MSG_GET_ARG_SIZE(arg->num_params);
> > > + rpc_arg = tee_shm_get_va(shm, rpc_arg_offs);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(arg))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(arg);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (rpc_arg && tee_shm_is_dynamic(shm)) {
> > > + param.a0 = OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_REGD_ARG;
> > > + reg_pair_from_64(¶m.a1, ¶m.a2, (u_long)shm);
> > > + param.a3 = 0;
> > > + } else {
> > > + phys_addr_t parg;
> > > +
> > > + rc = tee_shm_get_pa(shm, 0, &parg);
> > > + if (rc)
> > > + return rc;
> > > +
> > > + if (rpc_arg)
> > > + param.a0 = OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_RPC_ARG;
> > > + else
> > > + param.a0 = OPTEE_SMC_CALL_WITH_ARG;
> > > + reg_pair_from_64(¶m.a1, ¶m.a2, parg);
> > > + }
> > > /* Initialize waiter */
> > > optee_cq_wait_init(&optee->call_queue, &w);
> > > while (true) {
> > > @@ -862,7 +893,7 @@ static int optee_smc_do_call_with_arg(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > > param.a1 = res.a1;
> > > param.a2 = res.a2;
> > > param.a3 = res.a3;
> > > - optee_handle_rpc(ctx, ¶m, &call_ctx);
> > > + optee_handle_rpc(ctx, rpc_arg, ¶m, &call_ctx);
> > > } else {
> > > rc = res.a0;
> > > break;
> > > @@ -1118,7 +1149,8 @@ static bool optee_msg_api_revision_is_compatible(optee_invoke_fn *invoke_fn)
> > > }
> > >
> > > static bool optee_msg_exchange_capabilities(optee_invoke_fn *invoke_fn,
> > > - u32 *sec_caps, u32 *max_notif_value)
> > > + u32 *sec_caps, u32 *max_notif_value,
> > > + unsigned int *rpc_param_count)
> > > {
> > > union {
> > > struct arm_smccc_res smccc;
> > > @@ -1145,6 +1177,10 @@ static bool optee_msg_exchange_capabilities(optee_invoke_fn *invoke_fn,
> > > *max_notif_value = res.result.max_notif_value;
> > > else
> > > *max_notif_value = OPTEE_DEFAULT_MAX_NOTIF_VALUE;
> > > + if (*sec_caps & OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_RPC_ARG)
> > > + *rpc_param_count = (u8)res.result.data;
> > > + else
> > > + *rpc_param_count = 0;
> > >
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > > @@ -1283,6 +1319,7 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > struct tee_shm_pool *pool = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > struct optee *optee = NULL;
> > > void *memremaped_shm = NULL;
> > > + unsigned int rpc_param_count;
> > > struct tee_device *teedev;
> > > struct tee_context *ctx;
> > > u32 max_notif_value;
> > > @@ -1306,7 +1343,8 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (!optee_msg_exchange_capabilities(invoke_fn, &sec_caps,
> > > - &max_notif_value)) {
> > > + &max_notif_value,
> > > + &rpc_param_count)) {
> > > pr_warn("capabilities mismatch\n");
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > > @@ -1335,6 +1373,7 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > optee->ops = &optee_ops;
> > > optee->smc.invoke_fn = invoke_fn;
> > > optee->smc.sec_caps = sec_caps;
> > > + optee->rpc_param_count = rpc_param_count;
> > >
> > > teedev = tee_device_alloc(&optee_clnt_desc, NULL, pool, optee);
> > > if (IS_ERR(teedev)) {
> > > @@ -1403,7 +1442,12 @@ static int optee_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > */
> > > optee_disable_unmapped_shm_cache(optee);
> > >
> > > - optee_enable_shm_cache(optee);
> > > + /*
> > > + * Only enable the shm cache in case we're not able to pass the RPC
> > > + * arg struct right after the normal arg struct.
> > > + */
> > > + if (!optee->rpc_param_count)
> > > + optee_enable_shm_cache(optee);
> > >
> >
> > I think a similar check is required for redundant
> > optee_disable_shm_cache() and optee_disable_unmapped_shm_cache().
>
> I believe optee_disable_unmapped_shm_cache() should be done
> unconditionally as it cleans up from previous a instance of an OP-TEE
> driver and who knows that state that was in.
>
> The call to optee_disable_shm_cache() is harmless, but you're right it's
> unnecesary so we should skip it if not needed. I'll fix.
>
> Thanks,
> Jens
>
> >
> > -Sumit
> >
> > > if (optee->smc.sec_caps & OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_DYNAMIC_SHM)
> > > pr_info("dynamic shared memory is enabled\n");
> > > --
> > > 2.31.1
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists