[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b331befede093265cd9fc0773000c1bf715a2c8.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 20:06:44 +0800
From: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
To: <xinlei.lee@...iatek.com>, <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <airlied@...ux.ie>, <daniel@...ll.ch>,
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC: <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
<jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3,3/4] drm/mediatek: keep dsi as LP00 before dcs cmds
transfer
Hello Xinlei,
On Thu, 2022-03-17 at 15:53 +0800, xinlei.lee@...iatek.com wrote:
> From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
>
> To comply with the panel sequence, hold the mipi signal to LP00
Could you provide a example panel power sequence to let me understand
that?
Maybe you can put them in commit message.
> before the dcs cmds transmission,
> and pull the mipi signal high from LP00 to LP11 until the start of
> the dcs cmds transmission.
Maybe you can try to write as:
To comply with...
- Hold the mipi signal...
- Pul the miip signal high....
> If dsi is not in cmd mode, then dsi will pull the mipi signal high in
> the mtk_output_dsi_enable function.
>
> Fixes: 2dd8075d2185 ("drm/mediatek: mtk_dsi: Use the drm_panel_bridge
> API")
>
Can you remove this blank line?
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> --
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> index e33caaca11a7..b509d59235e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ struct mtk_dsi {
> struct mtk_phy_timing phy_timing;
> int refcount;
> bool enabled;
> + bool lanes_ready;
> u32 irq_data;
> wait_queue_head_t irq_wait_queue;
> const struct mtk_dsi_driver_data *driver_data;
> @@ -654,13 +655,6 @@ static int mtk_dsi_poweron(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(dsi);
> mtk_dsi_set_interrupt_enable(dsi);
>
> - mtk_dsi_rxtx_control(dsi);
> - usleep_range(30, 100);
> - mtk_dsi_reset_dphy(dsi);
> - mtk_dsi_clk_ulp_mode_leave(dsi);
> - mtk_dsi_lane0_ulp_mode_leave(dsi);
> - mtk_dsi_clk_hs_mode(dsi, 0);
> -
> return 0;
> err_disable_engine_clk:
> clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->engine_clk);
> @@ -689,6 +683,8 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->digital_clk);
>
> phy_power_off(dsi->phy);
> +
> + dsi->lanes_ready = false;
> }
>
> static void mtk_output_dsi_enable(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> @@ -696,6 +692,16 @@ static void mtk_output_dsi_enable(struct mtk_dsi
> *dsi)
> if (dsi->enabled)
> return;
>
> + if (!dsi->lanes_ready) {
> + dsi->lanes_ready = true;
> + mtk_dsi_rxtx_control(dsi);
> + usleep_range(30, 100);
> + mtk_dsi_reset_dphy(dsi);
> + mtk_dsi_clk_ulp_mode_leave(dsi);
> + mtk_dsi_lane0_ulp_mode_leave(dsi);
> + mtk_dsi_clk_hs_mode(dsi, 0);
> + }
> +
> mtk_dsi_set_mode(dsi);
> mtk_dsi_clk_hs_mode(dsi, 1);
>
> @@ -995,6 +1001,17 @@ static ssize_t mtk_dsi_host_transfer(struct
> mipi_dsi_host *host,
> if (MTK_DSI_HOST_IS_READ(msg->type))
> irq_flag |= LPRX_RD_RDY_INT_FLAG;
>
> + if (!dsi->lanes_ready) {
> + dsi->lanes_ready = true;
> + mtk_dsi_rxtx_control(dsi);
> + usleep_range(30, 100);
> + mtk_dsi_reset_dphy(dsi);
> + mtk_dsi_clk_ulp_mode_leave(dsi);
> + mtk_dsi_lane0_ulp_mode_leave(dsi);
> + mtk_dsi_clk_hs_mode(dsi, 0);
The drivers are the same with previous modification.
I think you can use a funtion for them?
> + msleep(20);
Why delay 20ms but not in mtk_output_dsi_enable?
BRs,
Rex
> + }
> +
> ret = mtk_dsi_host_send_cmd(dsi, msg, irq_flag);
> if (ret)
> goto restore_dsi_mode;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists