lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <79e0be67-341d-34cb-bb48-30f122d9e239@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:29:09 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        naoya.horiguchi@....com, shy828301@...il.com,
        mike.kravetz@...cle.com
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/memory-failure.c: avoid calling
 invalidate_inode_page() with unexpected pages

On 18.03.22 08:39, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> invalidate_inode_page() can invalidate the pages in the swap cache because
> the check of page->mapping != mapping is removed via Matthew's patch titled
> "mm/truncate: Inline invalidate_complete_page() into its one caller". But
> invalidate_inode_page() is not expected to deal with the pages in the swap
> cache. Also non-lru movable page can reach here too. They're not page cache
> pages. Skip these pages by checking PageSwapCache and PageLRU to fix this
> unexpected issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---
>  mm/memory-failure.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 5444a8ef4867..ecf45961f3b6 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -2178,7 +2178,7 @@ static int __soft_offline_page(struct page *page)
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!PageHuge(page))
> +	if (!PageHuge(page) && PageLRU(page) && !PageSwapCache(page))
>  		/*
>  		 * Try to invalidate first. This should work for
>  		 * non dirty unmapped page cache pages.

I'm not familiar with this code to ack this, but it looks sane to me.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ