[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61547556-790f-f74f-ca2e-b2fde714a7fa@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 23:50:42 +0900
From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@...il.com>,
Boris-Chengbiao Zhou <bobo1239@....de>,
Wu XiangCheng <bobwxc@...il.cn>, Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yuki Okushi <jtitor@...6.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Finn Behrens <me@...enk.de>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
rust-for-linux <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/20] docs: add Rust documentation
Hi Miguel,
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 09:19:37 +0100,
Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi Akira,
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:47 AM Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/rust/logo.svg b/Documentation/rust/logo.svg
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..65be792a5abe
>>> --- /dev/null
>>
>> How about adding a suitable license identifier in a comment?
>
> For the next round, I did not apply this suggestion, because it is
> unclear which license identifier to use: it would be probably be the
> same as the `COPYING-logo` one (which would be used also for the Tux
> SVG, if it gets merged -- it was sent a while ago).
I see.
As I see v2 15/20, the SVG figure is among other documentation updates.
IIUC, this figure/logo was in PNG at first, but Jon suggested vector graphics.
If this is the case, it deserves an individual patch with a changelog
explaining why it is in SVG, where the Tux figure came from, what was the
original PNG logo, who contributed the SVG conversion, etc.
I understand you did all the SVG work, didn't you?
I don't think those many Co-developed-by tags apply to this figure.
I'm saying this because this figure/logo can be reused in other open-
source projects on its own. It would be worth clarifying its origin
in the Git history as well as in COPYING-logo.
Thanks, Akira
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists