[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220317150804.GB459366@lothringen>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:08:04 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nitesh Lal <nilal@...hat.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Alex Belits <abelits@...its.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Oscar Shiang <oscar0225@...email.tw>
Subject: Re: [patch v12 00/13] extensible prctl task isolation interface and
vmstat sync
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 12:31:32PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> The logic to disable vmstat worker thread, when entering
> nohz full, does not cover all scenarios. For example, it is possible
> for the following to happen:
>
> 1) enter nohz_full, which calls refresh_cpu_vm_stats, syncing the stats.
> 2) app runs mlock, which increases counters for mlock'ed pages.
> 3) start -RT loop
>
> Since refresh_cpu_vm_stats from nohz_full logic can happen _before_
> the mlock, vmstat shepherd can restart vmstat worker thread on
> the CPU in question.
>
> To fix this, add task isolation prctl interface to quiesce
> deferred actions when returning to userspace.
>
> The patchset is based on ideas and code from the
> task isolation patchset from Alex Belits:
> https://lwn.net/Articles/816298/
>
> Please refer to Documentation/userspace-api/task_isolation.rst
> (patch 1) for details. Its attached at the end of this message
> in .txt format as well.
>
> Note: the prctl interface is independent of nohz_full=.
>
> The userspace patches can be found at https://people.redhat.com/~mtosatti/task-isol-v6-userspace-patches/
>
> - qemu-task-isolation.patch: activate task isolation from CPU execution loop
> - rt-tests-task-isolation.patch: add task isolation activation to cyclictest/oslat
> - util-linux-chisol.patch: add chisol tool to util-linux.
I still see a few details to sort out but overall the whole thing looks good:
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Perhaps it's time to apply this patchset on some branch and iterate from there.
Thomas, Peter, what do you think?
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists