linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: Untangle config dependencies for demote-on-reclaim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87tubvk95f.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Mar 2022 15:33:00 +0800
From:   "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:     Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Abhishek Goel <huntbag@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Untangle config dependencies for demote-on-reclaim

Hi, Oscar,

Thanks for doing this.

Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de> writes:

> At the time demote-on-reclaim was introduced, it was tied to
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU + CONFIG_MIGRATE, but that is not really
> accurate.
>
> The only two things we need to depen on is CONFIG_NUMA +
> CONFIG_MIGRATE, so clean this up.
> Furthermore, we only register the hotplug memory notifier
> when the system has CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> Suggested-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/migrate.h |  5 ++++-
>  mm/migrate.c            | 11 ++++++-----
>  mm/vmstat.c             |  2 --
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
> index a4a336fd81fc..1efabe7bb5fc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/migrate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
> @@ -49,14 +49,17 @@ int folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
>  
>  extern bool numa_demotion_enabled;
>  extern void migrate_on_reclaim_init(void);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>  extern void set_migration_target_nodes(void);
> +extern void migrate_on_reclaim_init(void);
>  #else
>  static inline void set_migration_target_nodes(void) {}
> +static inline void migrate_on_reclaim_init(void) {}
>  #endif
>  #else
>  
>  static inline void set_migration_target_nodes(void) {}
> +static inline void migrate_on_reclaim_init(void) {}

To avoid to duplicate the void definition.  How about to usec

#if defined(CONFIG_MIGRATION) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
/* xxx */
#else
/* yyy */
#endif

And we need to put "numa_demotion_enabled" inside too.  Because it is
defined inside CONFIG_NUMA too now.

>  static inline void putback_movable_pages(struct list_head *l) {}
>  static inline int migrate_pages(struct list_head *l, new_page_t new,
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 3364bfaddeef..118f71425241 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -2144,7 +2144,6 @@ int migrate_misplaced_page(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> -#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>  
>  /*
>   * node_demotion[] example:
> @@ -2278,7 +2277,6 @@ int next_demotion_node(int node)
>  	return target;
>  }
>  
> -#if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)
>  /* Disable reclaim-based migration. */
>  static void __disable_all_migrate_targets(void)
>  {
> @@ -2471,6 +2469,7 @@ void set_migration_target_nodes(void)
>   * __set_migration_target_nodes() can be used as opposed to
>   * set_migration_target_nodes().
>   */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>  static int __meminit migrate_on_reclaim_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
>  						 unsigned long action, void *_arg)
>  {
> @@ -2516,6 +2515,7 @@ static int __meminit migrate_on_reclaim_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
>  
>  	return notifier_from_errno(0);
>  }
> +#endif
>  
>  void __init migrate_on_reclaim_init(void)
>  {
> @@ -2523,8 +2523,9 @@ void __init migrate_on_reclaim_init(void)
>  				      sizeof(struct demotion_nodes),
>  				      GFP_KERNEL);
>  	WARN_ON(!node_demotion);
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>  	hotplug_memory_notifier(migrate_on_reclaim_callback, 100);
> +#endif

Another way is to add "#else" and void definition after
migrate_on_reclaim_callback().  But this isn't a big deal.

>  	/*
>  	 * At this point, all numa nodes with memory/CPus have their state
>  	 * properly set, so we can build the demotion order now.
> @@ -2535,7 +2536,6 @@ void __init migrate_on_reclaim_init(void)
>  	set_migration_target_nodes();
>  	cpus_read_unlock();
>  }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
>  
>  bool numa_demotion_enabled = false;

As above, this is under CONFIG_NUMA too now.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

> @@ -2596,4 +2596,5 @@ static int __init numa_init_sysfs(void)
>  	return err;
>  }
>  subsys_initcall(numa_init_sysfs);
> -#endif
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SYSFS */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
> index b75b1a64b54c..f2d0dec1062d 100644
> --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> @@ -2111,9 +2111,7 @@ void __init init_mm_internals(void)
>  
>  	start_shepherd_timer();
>  #endif
> -#if defined(CONFIG_MIGRATION) && defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)
>  	migrate_on_reclaim_init();
> -#endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>  	proc_create_seq("buddyinfo", 0444, NULL, &fragmentation_op);
>  	proc_create_seq("pagetypeinfo", 0400, NULL, &pagetypeinfo_op);