linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the qcom tree with the imx-mxs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:44:20 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
        ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the qcom tree with the imx-mxs tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:34:32 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the qcom tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   6e3807935e18 ("arm64: defconfig: re-order default configuration")
>   dde8cd786e37 ("arm64: defconfig: rebuild default configuration")
> 
> from the imx-mxs tree and commits:
> 
>   cd7ce3e18afa ("arm64: defconfig: Enable SM8250 video clock controller")
>   17ef0b4b441f ("arm64: defconfig: enable mcp251xfd driver")
> 
> from the qcom tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> index 2bb7765e5d82,bbe40f0fd620..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> @@@ -383,9 -383,11 +385,12 @@@ CONFIG_ATH10K=
>   CONFIG_ATH10K_PCI=m
>   CONFIG_ATH10K_SNOC=m
>   CONFIG_WCN36XX=m
> + CONFIG_ATH11K=m
> + CONFIG_ATH11K_AHB=m
> + CONFIG_ATH11K_PCI=m
>   CONFIG_BRCMFMAC=m
>   CONFIG_MWIFIEX=m
>  +CONFIG_MWIFIEX_SDIO=m
>   CONFIG_MWIFIEX_PCIE=m
>   CONFIG_WL18XX=m
>   CONFIG_WLCORE_SDIO=m
> @@@ -602,9 -607,9 +608,10 @@@ CONFIG_IMX_SC_WDT=
>   CONFIG_QCOM_WDT=m
>   CONFIG_MESON_GXBB_WATCHDOG=m
>   CONFIG_MESON_WATCHDOG=m
>  +CONFIG_ARM_SMC_WATCHDOG=y
>   CONFIG_RENESAS_WDT=y
>   CONFIG_UNIPHIER_WATCHDOG=y
> + CONFIG_PM8916_WATCHDOG=m
>   CONFIG_BCM2835_WDT=y
>   CONFIG_MFD_ALTERA_SYSMGR=y
>   CONFIG_MFD_BD9571MWV=y
> @@@ -1009,6 -1021,10 +1016,7 @@@ CONFIG_SDM_DISPCC_845=
>   CONFIG_SM_GCC_8350=y
>   CONFIG_SM_GPUCC_8150=y
>   CONFIG_SM_GPUCC_8250=y
>  -CONFIG_SM_DISPCC_8250=y
> + CONFIG_SM_VIDEOCC_8250=y
>   CONFIG_QCOM_HFPLL=y
>   CONFIG_CLK_GFM_LPASS_SM8250=m
>   CONFIG_CLK_RCAR_USB2_CLOCK_SEL=y
> @@@ -1042,11 -1058,10 +1050,12 @@@ CONFIG_RASPBERRYPI_POWER=
>   CONFIG_FSL_DPAA=y
>   CONFIG_FSL_MC_DPIO=y
>   CONFIG_FSL_RCPM=y
>  +CONFIG_MTK_DEVAPC=m
>   CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=y
> + CONFIG_MAILBOX=y
>   CONFIG_QCOM_AOSS_QMP=y
>   CONFIG_QCOM_COMMAND_DB=y
>  +CONFIG_QCOM_CPR=y
>   CONFIG_QCOM_GENI_SE=y
>   CONFIG_QCOM_RMTFS_MEM=m
>   CONFIG_QCOM_RPMH=y

This is now a conflict between the qcom tree and the arm-soc tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped