[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220318075129.GB17484@X58A-UD3R>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 16:51:29 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
will@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
joel@...lfernandes.org, sashal@...nel.org, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch,
chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, duyuyang@...il.com,
johannes.berg@...el.com, tj@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
willy@...radead.org, david@...morbit.com, amir73il@...il.com,
bfields@...ldses.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
kernel-team@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mhocko@...nel.org, minchan@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
vdavydov.dev@...il.com, sj@...nel.org, jglisse@...hat.com,
dennis@...nel.org, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, ngupta@...are.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, paolo.valente@...aro.org,
josef@...icpanda.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, jack@...e.com,
jlayton@...nel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, hch@...radead.org,
djwong@...nel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
airlied@...ux.ie, rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com,
melissa.srw@...il.com, hamohammed.sa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/24] DEPT(Dependency Tracker)
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:30:02AM +0000, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 01:32:13PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 01:53:26AM +0000, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 04:06:19PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > > Hi Linus and folks,
> > > >
> > > > I've been developing a tool for detecting deadlock possibilities by
> > > > tracking wait/event rather than lock(?) acquisition order to try to
> > > > cover all synchonization machanisms. It's done on v5.17-rc1 tag.
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/lgebyungchulpark/linux-dept/commits/dept1.14_on_v5.17-rc1
> > > >
> > >
> > > Small feedback unrelated to thread:
> > > I'm not sure "Need to expand the ring buffer" is something to call
> > > WARN(). Is this stack trace useful for something?
> > > ========
> > >
> > > Hello Byungchul. These are two warnings of DEPT on system.
> >
> > Hi Hyeonggon,
> >
> > Could you run scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh and share the result instead
> > of the raw format below if the reports still appear with PATCH v5? It'd
> > be appreciated (:
> >
>
> Hi Byungchul.
>
> on dept1.18_on_v5.17-rc7, the kernel_clone() warning has gone.
> There is one warning remaining on my system:
>
> It warns when running kunit-try-catch-test testcase.
Hi Hyeonggon,
I can reproduce it thanks to you. I will let you know on all works done.
Thanks,
Byungchul
> ===================================================
> DEPT: Circular dependency has been detected.
> 5.17.0-rc7+ #4 Not tainted
> ---------------------------------------------------
> summary
> ---------------------------------------------------
> *** AA DEADLOCK ***
>
> context A
> [S] (unknown)(&try_completion:0)
> [W] wait_for_completion_timeout(&try_completion:0)
> [E] complete(&try_completion:0)
>
> [S]: start of the event context
> [W]: the wait blocked
> [E]: the event not reachable
> ---------------------------------------------------
> context A's detail
> ---------------------------------------------------
> context A
> [S] (unknown)(&try_completion:0)
> [W] wait_for_completion_timeout(&try_completion:0)
> [E] complete(&try_completion:0)
>
> [S] (unknown)(&try_completion:0):
> (N/A)
>
> [W] wait_for_completion_timeout(&try_completion:0):
> kunit_try_catch_run (lib/kunit/try-catch.c:78 (discriminator 1))
> stacktrace:
> dept_wait (kernel/dependency/dept.c:2149)
> wait_for_completion_timeout (kernel/sched/completion.c:119 (discriminator 4) kernel/sched/completion.c:165 (discriminator 4))
> kunit_try_catch_run (lib/kunit/try-catch.c:78 (discriminator 1))
> kunit_test_try_catch_successful_try_no_catch (lib/kunit/kunit-test.c:43)
> kunit_try_run_case (lib/kunit/test.c:333 lib/kunit/test.c:374)
> kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter (lib/kunit/try-catch.c:30)
> kthread (kernel/kthread.c:379)
> ret_from_fork (arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:757)
>
> [E] complete(&try_completion:0):
> kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:327)
> stacktrace:
> dept_event (kernel/dependency/dept.c:2376 (discriminator 2))
> complete (kernel/sched/completion.c:33 (discriminator 4))
> kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:327)
> kunit_try_catch_throw (lib/kunit/try-catch.c:18)
> kthread (kernel/kthread.c:379)
> ret_from_fork (arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:757)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> information that might be helpful
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> Call trace:
> dump_backtrace.part.0 (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:186)
> show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:193)
> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:107 (discriminator 4))
> dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:114)
> print_circle (./arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:112 ./arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h:30 ./include/linux/atomic/atomic-arch-fallback.h:511 ./include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:258 kernel/dependency/dept.c:140 kernel/dependency/dept.c:748)
> cb_check_dl (kernel/dependency/dept.c:1083 kernel/dependency/dept.c:1064)
> bfs (kernel/dependency/dept.c:833)
> add_dep (kernel/dependency/dept.c:1409)
> do_event (kernel/dependency/dept.c:175 kernel/dependency/dept.c:1644)
> dept_event (kernel/dependency/dept.c:2376 (discriminator 2))
> complete (kernel/sched/completion.c:33 (discriminator 4))
> kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:327)
> kunit_try_catch_throw (lib/kunit/try-catch.c:18)
> kthread (kernel/kthread.c:379)
> ret_from_fork (arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:757)
>
> --
> Thank you, You are awesome!
> Hyeonggon :-)
>
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/3/15/1277
> > (or https://github.com/lgebyungchulpark/linux-dept/commits/dept1.18_on_v5.17-rc7)
> >
> > Thank you very much!
> >
> > --
> > Byungchul
> >
> > > Both cases look similar.
> > >
> > > In what case DEPT says (unknown)?
> > > I'm not sure we can properly debug this.
> > >
> > > ===================================================
> > > DEPT: Circular dependency has been detected.
> > > 5.17.0-rc1+ #3 Tainted: G W
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > summary
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > *** AA DEADLOCK ***
> > >
> > > context A
> > > [S] (unknown)(&vfork:0)
> > > [W] wait_for_completion_killable(&vfork:0)
> > > [E] complete(&vfork:0)
> > >
> > > [S]: start of the event context
> > > [W]: the wait blocked
> > > [E]: the event not reachable
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > context A's detail
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > context A
> > > [S] (unknown)(&vfork:0)
> > > [W] wait_for_completion_killable(&vfork:0)
> > > [E] complete(&vfork:0)
> > >
> > > [S] (unknown)(&vfork:0):
> > > (N/A)
> > >
> > > [W] wait_for_completion_killable(&vfork:0):
> > > [<ffffffc00802204c>] kernel_clone+0x25c/0x2b8
> > > stacktrace:
> > > dept_wait+0x74/0x88
> > > wait_for_completion_killable+0x60/0xa0
> > > kernel_clone+0x25c/0x2b8
> > > __do_sys_clone+0x5c/0x74
> > > __arm64_sys_clone+0x18/0x20
> > > invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x78/0xc4
> > > do_el0_svc+0x98/0xd0
> > > el0_svc+0x44/0xe4
> > > el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0x12c
> > > el0t_64_sync+0x158/0x15c
> > >
> > > [E] complete(&vfork:0):
> > > [<ffffffc00801f49c>] mm_release+0x7c/0x90
> > > stacktrace:
> > > dept_event+0xe0/0x100
> > > complete+0x48/0x98
> > > mm_release+0x7c/0x90
> > > exit_mm_release+0xc/0x14
> > > do_exit+0x1b4/0x81c
> > > do_group_exit+0x30/0x9c
> > > __wake_up_parent+0x0/0x24
> > > invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x78/0xc4
> > > do_el0_svc+0x98/0xd0
> > > el0_svc+0x44/0xe4
> > > el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0x12c
> > > el0t_64_sync+0x158/0x15c
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > information that might be helpful
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > CPU: 6 PID: 229 Comm: start-stop-daem Tainted: G W 5.17.0-rc1+ #3
> > > Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> > > Call trace:
> > > dump_backtrace.part.0+0x9c/0xc4
> > > show_stack+0x14/0x28
> > > dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xcc
> > > dump_stack+0x14/0x2c
> > > print_circle+0x2d4/0x438
> > > cb_check_dl+0x44/0x70
> > > bfs+0x60/0x168
> > > add_dep+0x88/0x11c
> > > do_event.constprop.0+0x19c/0x2c0
> > > dept_event+0xe0/0x100
> > > complete+0x48/0x98
> > > mm_release+0x7c/0x90
> > > exit_mm_release+0xc/0x14
> > > do_exit+0x1b4/0x81c
> > > do_group_exit+0x30/0x9c
> > > __wake_up_parent+0x0/0x24
> > > invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x78/0xc4
> > > do_el0_svc+0x98/0xd0
> > > el0_svc+0x44/0xe4
> > > el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0x12c
> > > el0t_64_sync+0x158/0x15c
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ===================================================
> > > DEPT: Circular dependency has been detected.
> > > 5.17.0-rc1+ #3 Tainted: G W
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > summary
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > *** AA DEADLOCK ***
> > >
> > > context A
> > > [S] (unknown)(&try_completion:0)
> > > [W] wait_for_completion_timeout(&try_completion:0)
> > > [E] complete(&try_completion:0)
> > >
> > > [S]: start of the event context
> > > [W]: the wait blocked
> > > [E]: the event not reachable
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > context A's detail
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > context A
> > > [S] (unknown)(&try_completion:0)
> > > [W] wait_for_completion_timeout(&try_completion:0)
> > > [E] complete(&try_completion:0)
> > >
> > > [S] (unknown)(&try_completion:0):
> > > (N/A)
> > >
> > > [W] wait_for_completion_timeout(&try_completion:0):
> > > [<ffffffc008166bf4>] kunit_try_catch_run+0xb4/0x160
> > > stacktrace:
> > > dept_wait+0x74/0x88
> > > wait_for_completion_timeout+0x64/0xa0
> > > kunit_try_catch_run+0xb4/0x160
> > > kunit_test_try_catch_successful_try_no_catch+0x3c/0x98
> > > kunit_try_run_case+0x9c/0xa0
> > > kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x1c/0x28
> > > kthread+0xd4/0xe4
> > > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> > >
> > > [E] complete(&try_completion:0):
> > > [<ffffffc00803dce4>] kthread_complete_and_exit+0x18/0x20
> > > stacktrace:
> > > dept_event+0xe0/0x100
> > > complete+0x48/0x98
> > > kthread_complete_and_exit+0x18/0x20
> > > kunit_try_catch_throw+0x0/0x1c
> > > kthread+0xd4/0xe4
> > > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > information that might be helpful
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > CPU: 15 PID: 132 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G W 5.17.0-rc1+ #3
> > > Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> > > Call trace:
> > > dump_backtrace.part.0+0x9c/0xc4
> > > show_stack+0x14/0x28
> > > dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xcc
> > > dump_stack+0x14/0x2c
> > > print_circle+0x2d4/0x438
> > > cb_check_dl+0x44/0x70
> > > bfs+0x60/0x168
> > > add_dep+0x88/0x11c
> > > do_event.constprop.0+0x19c/0x2c0
> > > dept_event+0xe0/0x100
> > > complete+0x48/0x98
> > > kthread_complete_and_exit+0x18/0x20
> > > kunit_try_catch_throw+0x0/0x1c
> > > kthread+0xd4/0xe4
> > > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> > >
> > >
> > > > Benifit:
> > > >
> > > > 0. Works with all lock primitives.
> > > > 1. Works with wait_for_completion()/complete().
> > > > 2. Works with 'wait' on PG_locked.
> > > > 3. Works with 'wait' on PG_writeback.
> > > > 4. Works with swait/wakeup.
> > > > 5. Works with waitqueue.
> > > > 6. Multiple reports are allowed.
> > > > 7. Deduplication control on multiple reports.
> > > > 8. Withstand false positives thanks to 6.
> > > > 9. Easy to tag any wait/event.
> > > >
> > > > Future work:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > --
> > > > 1.9.1
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thank you, You are awesome!
> > > Hyeonggon :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists