lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27057728-e22f-a36e-bc68-aac311aeecba@amd.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:29:11 +0530
From:   Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
        jolsa@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, like.xu.linux@...il.com,
        eranian@...gle.com, ananth.narayan@....com, ravi.bangoria@....com,
        santosh.shukla@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] kvm: x86/cpuid: Fix Architectural Performance
 Monitoring support


On 3/17/2022 5:37 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:58:36AM +0530, Sandipan Das wrote:
>> CPUID 0xA provides information on Architectural Performance
>> Monitoring features on some x86 processors. It advertises a
>> PMU version which Qemu uses to determine the availability of
>> additional MSRs to manage the PMCs.
>>
>> Upon receiving a KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID ioctl request for
>> the same, the kernel constructs return values based on the
>> x86_pmu_capability irrespective of the vendor.
>>
>> This CPUID function and additional MSRs are not supported on
>> AMD processors. If PerfMonV2 is detected, the PMU version is
>> set to 2 and guest startup breaks because of an attempt to
>> access a non-existent MSR. Return zeros to avoid this.
>>
>> Fixes: a6c06ed1a60a ("KVM: Expose the architectural performance monitoring CPUID leaf")
>> Reported-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> index b8f8d268d058..1d9ca5726167 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>> @@ -865,6 +865,11 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array, u32 function)
>>  		union cpuid10_eax eax;
>>  		union cpuid10_edx edx;
>>  
>> +		if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) {
>> +			entry->eax = entry->ebx = entry->ecx = entry->edx = 0;
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +
> 
> Because actually implementing perfmon-v2 would've been too convenient,
> right? IIRC you're very close to actually supporing perfmon-v2
> capability wise here.

That's in the works as well. However, in this case, Qemu will have
to test CPUID Fn8000_0022 EAX bit 0 to see if the global control and
status registers are available.

- Sandipan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ