[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220318005817.2141903-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 00:58:17 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: james.smart@...adcom.com
Cc: dick.kennedy@...adcom.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask will never fail if
dev->dma_mask is non-NULL.
So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason.
Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly.
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
index f5c363f663f6..e793c4183499 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -9187,8 +9187,6 @@ lpfc_sli_pci_mem_setup(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
/* Set the device DMA mask size */
error = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
- if (error)
- error = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
if (error)
return error;
error = -ENODEV;
@@ -11714,8 +11712,6 @@ lpfc_sli4_pci_mem_setup(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
/* Set the device DMA mask size */
error = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
- if (error)
- error = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
if (error)
return error;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists