[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220318005938.2142028-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 00:59:38 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: hao.wu@...el.com
Cc: trix@...hat.com, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] fpga: dfl: pci: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask will never fail if
dev->dma_mask is non-NULL.
So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason.
Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly.
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
---
drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
index 717ac9715970..42fdfa7a28d6 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
+++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
@@ -356,8 +356,6 @@ int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
pci_set_master(pcidev);
ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pcidev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
- if (ret)
- ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pcidev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
if (ret) {
dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "No suitable DMA support available.\n");
goto disable_error_report_exit;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists