linux-kernel - [PATCH] [ARM] orion5x: fix typos in comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220318103729.157574-3-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Date:   Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:36:58 +0100
From:   Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [ARM] orion5x: fix typos in comments

Various spelling mistakes in comments.
Detected with the help of Coccinelle.

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>

---
 arch/arm/mach-orion5x/dns323-setup.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-orion5x/dns323-setup.c b/arch/arm/mach-orion5x/dns323-setup.c
index 87cb47220e82..d69259b6b60d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-orion5x/dns323-setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-orion5x/dns323-setup.c
@@ -696,12 +696,12 @@ static void __init dns323_init(void)
 			pr_err("DNS-323: failed to setup power-off GPIO\n");
 		pm_power_off = dns323c_power_off;
 
-		/* Now, -this- should theorically be done by the sata_mv driver
+		/* Now, -this- should theoretically be done by the sata_mv driver
 		 * once I figure out what's going on there. Maybe the behaviour
 		 * of the LEDs should be somewhat passed via the platform_data.
 		 * for now, just whack the register and make the LEDs happy
 		 *
-		 * Note: AFAIK, rev B1 needs the same treatement but I'll let
+		 * Note: AFAIK, rev B1 needs the same treatment but I'll let
 		 * somebody else test it.
 		 */
 		writel(0x5, ORION5X_SATA_VIRT_BASE + 0x2c);