[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220318120647.2c89bf05@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 12:06:47 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Julian Braha <julianbraha@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the
drm-misc-fixes tree
Hi all,
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:55:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/Kconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> 3c3384050d68 ("drm: Don't make DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE dependent on DRM_KMS_HELPERS")
>
> from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commit:
>
> 803abfd8dda5 ("drm: bridge: fix unmet dependency on DRM_KMS_HELPER for DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE")
>
> from the drm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just used the latter) and can carry the fix as
But that failed during configuration, so I went back and used the
former change.
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists