[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjRlDytYjENcurpT@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:55:11 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, luto@...nel.org,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, jgross@...e.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
joro@...tes.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, knsathya@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, sdeep@...are.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 07/30] x86/traps: Add #VE support for TDX guest
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 01:32:07PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> The TDX rules are *much* nicer than SEV. They're also a lot nicer on
> TDX _now_ than they used to be. There are a few stubborn people at
> Intel who managed to add some drops of sanity to the architecture.
Right; that is saner than it used to be. I have definite memories that
pages could be taken back by the TDX thing and would need
re-authentication. A pool of 'fixed' pages was talked about. I'm glad to
hear all that is gone.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists