[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220318134750.GK11336@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 10:47:50 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Kumar, Sanjay K" <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"Zanussi, Tom" <tom.zanussi@...el.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] iommu/vt-d: Implement device_pasid domain attach
ops
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:47:23AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> may remember more detail here) and we didn't hear strong interest
> from customer on it. So this is just FYI for theoretical possibility and
> I'm fine with even disallowing it before those issues are resolved.
I didn't mean disallow, I just ment lets not optimize for it.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists