[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjSOExYBbpZ7Hw8Z@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:50:11 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: 'Baoquan He' <bhe@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn" <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
"amit.kachhap@....com" <amit.kachhap@....com>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] fs/proc/vmcore: Use iov_iter_count()
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 01:48:07PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> For some definition of 'cleaner' :-)
>
> iter->count is clearly a simple, cheap structure member lookup.
> OTOH iov_iter_count(iter) might be an expensive traversal of
> the vector (or worse).
>
> So a quick read of the code by someone who isn't an expert
> in the iov functions leaves them wondering what is going on
> or having to spend time locating the definition ...
Thank you for having an opinion. Al's opinion, as the iov_iter
maintainer, trumps yours.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists