| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 14:59:41 +0000
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/5] irqchip: Add RZ/G2L IA55 Interrupt Controller driver
Hi Marc,
Thank you for the review.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 4:13 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 01:24:01 +0000,
> Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add a driver for the Renesas RZ/G2L Interrupt Controller.
> >
> > This supports external pins being used as interrupts. It supports
> > one line for NMI, 8 external pins and 32 GPIO pins (out of 123)
> > to be used as IRQ lines.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 8 +
> > drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c | 462 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 471 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> > index 7038957f4a77..afc5999f4955 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> > @@ -242,6 +242,14 @@ config RENESAS_RZA1_IRQC
> > Enable support for the Renesas RZ/A1 Interrupt Controller, to use up
> > to 8 external interrupts with configurable sense select.
> >
> > +config RENESAS_RZG2L_IRQC
> > + bool "Renesas RZ/G2L (and alike SoC) IRQC support" if COMPILE_TEST
> > + select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> > + select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
> > + help
> > + Enable support for the Renesas RZ/G2L (and alike SoC) Interrupt Controller
> > + for external devices.
> > +
> > config SL28CPLD_INTC
> > bool "Kontron sl28cpld IRQ controller"
> > depends on MFD_SL28CPLD=y || COMPILE_TEST
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> > index c1f611cbfbf8..b536e514a7c9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RDA_INTC) += irq-rda-intc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_INTC_IRQPIN) += irq-renesas-intc-irqpin.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_IRQC) += irq-renesas-irqc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_RZA1_IRQC) += irq-renesas-rza1.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_RZG2L_IRQC) += irq-renesas-rzg2l.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_VERSATILE_FPGA_IRQ) += irq-versatile-fpga.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_NSPIRE) += irq-zevio.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VT8500) += irq-vt8500.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..be9741e88bd7
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-renesas-rzg2l.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Renesas RZ/G2L IRQC Driver
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2022 Renesas Electronics Corporation.
> > + *
> > + * Author: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> > +#include <linux/reset.h>
> > +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > +
> > +#define IRQC_IRQ_START 1
> > +#define IRQC_IRQ_COUNT 8
> > +#define IRQC_TINT_START 9
> > +#define IRQC_TINT_COUNT 32
> > +#define IRQC_NUM_IRQ 41
> > +
> > +#define ISCR 0x10
> > +#define IITSR 0x14
> > +#define TSCR 0x20
> > +#define TITSR0 0x24
> > +#define TITSR1 0x28
> > +#define TITSR0_MAX_INT 16
> > +#define TITSEL_WIDTH 0x2
> > +#define TSSR(n) (0x30 + ((n) * 4))
> > +#define TIEN BIT(7)
> > +#define TSSEL_SHIFT(n) (8 * (n))
> > +#define TSSEL_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
> > +#define IRQ_MASK 0x3
> > +
> > +#define TSSR_OFFSET(n) ((n) % 4)
> > +#define TSSR_INDEX(n) ((n) / 4)
> > +
> > +#define TITSR_TITSEL_EDGE_RISING 0
> > +#define TITSR_TITSEL_EDGE_FALLING 1
> > +#define TITSR_TITSEL_LEVEL_HIGH 2
> > +#define TITSR_TITSEL_LEVEL_LOW 3
> > +
> > +#define IITSR_IITSEL(n, sense) ((sense) << ((n) * 2))
> > +#define IITSR_IITSEL_LEVEL_LOW 0
> > +#define IITSR_IITSEL_EDGE_FALLING 1
> > +#define IITSR_IITSEL_EDGE_RISING 2
> > +#define IITSR_IITSEL_EDGE_BOTH 3
> > +#define IITSR_IITSEL_MASK(n) IITSR_IITSEL((n), 3)
> > +
> > +#define TINT_EXTRACT_HWIRQ(x) ((x) & ~GENMASK(31, 16))
> > +#define TINT_EXTRACT_GPIOINT(x) ((x) >> 16)
> > +
> > +struct rzg2l_irqc_priv {
> > + void __iomem *base;
> > + struct of_phandle_args map[IRQC_NUM_IRQ];
> > + raw_spinlock_t lock;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data {
> > + int tint;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *irq_data_to_priv(struct irq_data *data)
> > +{
> > + return data->domain->host_data;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rzg2l_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
> > +{
> > + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
> > + unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d) - IRQC_IRQ_START;
> > + u16 bit = BIT(hw_irq);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + u32 reg;
> > +
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
>
> Why the irqsave flavour? Is there any case where EOI isn't performed
> in a context that has interrupts already disabled?
>
Agreed this callback will be called with IRQ's disabled, so we can use
raw_spin_lock() instead.
> > + reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + ISCR);
> > + if (reg & bit)
> > + writel_relaxed(GENMASK(IRQC_IRQ_COUNT - 1, 0) & ~bit,
> > + priv->base + ISCR);
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> > + irq_chip_eoi_parent(d);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rzg2l_tint_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
> > +{
> > + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
> > + unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> > + u32 bit = BIT(hw_irq - IRQC_TINT_START);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + u32 reg;
> > +
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > + reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + TSCR);
> > + if (reg & bit)
> > + writel_relaxed(GENMASK(IRQC_TINT_COUNT - 1, 0) & ~bit,
> > + priv->base + TSCR);
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> > + irq_chip_eoi_parent(d);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rzg2l_irqc_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> > +
> > + if (hw_irq >= IRQC_IRQ_START && hw_irq <= IRQC_IRQ_COUNT)
> > + return rzg2l_irq_eoi(d);
>
> return function_returning_void()? No, please.
>
Agreed will drop that.
> > + else if (hw_irq >= IRQC_TINT_START && hw_irq <= IRQC_TINT_COUNT)
> > + return rzg2l_tint_eoi(d);
>
> Move the locking and the call to irq_chip_eoi_parent() here, as there
> is no need to duplicate any of this.
>
OK, will move the locking and irq_chip_eoi_parent() here.
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rzg2l_irqc_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> > +
> > + if (hw_irq >= IRQC_TINT_START && hw_irq <= IRQC_TINT_COUNT) {
> > + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
> > + u32 offset = hw_irq - IRQC_TINT_START;
> > + u32 tssr_offset = TSSR_OFFSET(offset);
> > + u8 tssr_index = TSSR_INDEX(offset);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + u32 reg;
> > +
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > + reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + TSSR(tssr_index));
> > + reg &= ~(TSSEL_MASK << tssr_offset);
> > + writel_relaxed(reg, priv->base + TSSR(tssr_index));
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> > + }
> > + irq_chip_disable_parent(d);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rzg2l_irqc_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> > +
> > + if (hw_irq >= IRQC_TINT_START && hw_irq <= IRQC_TINT_COUNT) {
> > + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
> > + struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data *chip_data = d->chip_data;
> > + u32 offset = hw_irq - IRQC_TINT_START;
> > + u32 tssr_offset = TSSR_OFFSET(offset);
> > + u8 tssr_index = TSSR_INDEX(offset);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + u32 reg;
> > +
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > + reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + TSSR(tssr_index));
> > + reg |= (TIEN | chip_data->tint) << TSSEL_SHIFT(tssr_offset);
> > + writel_relaxed(reg, priv->base + TSSR(tssr_index));
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> > + }
> > + irq_chip_enable_parent(d);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rzg2l_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d) - IRQC_IRQ_START;
> > + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + u16 sense, tmp;
> > +
> > + switch (type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) {
> > + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> > + sense = IITSR_IITSEL_LEVEL_LOW;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> > + sense = IITSR_IITSEL_EDGE_FALLING;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> > + sense = IITSR_IITSEL_EDGE_RISING;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH:
> > + sense = IITSR_IITSEL_EDGE_BOTH;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + default:
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
>
> This already happens in an irq disabled context.
>
> > + tmp = readl_relaxed(priv->base + IITSR);
> > + tmp &= ~IITSR_IITSEL_MASK(hw_irq);
> > + tmp |= IITSR_IITSEL(hw_irq, sense);
> > + writel_relaxed(tmp, priv->base + IITSR);
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>
> What about the parent irqchip? If this is a hierarchical setup, it
> definitely should be told.
>
Ok, I will add a call for it.
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rzg2l_tint_set_edge(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> > +{
> > + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = irq_data_to_priv(d);
> > + unsigned int hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> > + u32 titseln = hwirq - IRQC_TINT_START;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + u32 offset;
> > + u8 sense;
> > + u32 reg;
> > +
> > + switch (type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) {
> > + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> > + sense = TITSR_TITSEL_EDGE_RISING;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> > + sense = TITSR_TITSEL_EDGE_FALLING;
> > + break;
> > +
> > + default:
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (titseln < TITSR0_MAX_INT) {
> > + offset = TITSR0;
> > + } else {
> > + titseln /= TITSEL_WIDTH;
> > + offset = TITSR1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > + reg = readl_relaxed(priv->base + offset);
> > + reg &= ~(IRQ_MASK << (titseln * TITSEL_WIDTH));
> > + reg |= sense << (titseln * TITSEL_WIDTH);
> > + writel_relaxed(reg, priv->base + offset);
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rzg2l_irqc_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int hw_irq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
> > +
> > + if (hw_irq >= IRQC_IRQ_START && hw_irq <= IRQC_IRQ_COUNT)
> > + return rzg2l_irq_set_type(d, type);
> > + else if (hw_irq >= IRQC_TINT_START && hw_irq <= IRQC_TINT_COUNT)
> > + return rzg2l_tint_set_edge(d, type);
> > +
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct irq_chip irqc_chip = {
> > + .name = "rzg2l-irqc",
> > + .irq_eoi = rzg2l_irqc_eoi,
> > + .irq_mask = irq_chip_mask_parent,
> > + .irq_unmask = irq_chip_unmask_parent,
> > + .irq_disable = rzg2l_irqc_irq_disable,
> > + .irq_enable = rzg2l_irqc_irq_enable,
>
> So this looks a bit odd. irq_mask only calls the parent and does nothing
> locally, while irq_disable does something locally and calls into the
> parent. If the parent is a GIC, this is turned into a mask (GIC has no
> notion of disabled).
>
My understanding for enable callback is one time call during irq setup
and for the disable callback it will be called during irq shutdown.
During enable/disable callback we config the required registers.
For mask callback this will be called when an interrupt occurs and for
unmask we want to re-enable the interrupt. Since there are no specific
registers to mask/unmask on RZ/G2L the callbacks point to
irq_chip_mask_parent/irq_chip_unmask_parent.
I could move all the code from enable/disable callbacks to mask/unmask
callbacks and drop setting irq_enable/irq_disable completely. Please
let me know what should be the correct approach.
> If that's the flow you expect, good. But please check this is the case.
>
> > + .irq_get_irqchip_state = irq_chip_get_parent_state,
> > + .irq_set_irqchip_state = irq_chip_set_parent_state,
> > + .irq_retrigger = irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy,
> > + .irq_set_type = rzg2l_irqc_set_type,
> > + .flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND |
> > + IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED |
> > + IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int rzg2l_irqc_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> > + unsigned int nr_irqs, void *arg)
> > +{
> > + struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv = domain->host_data;
> > + struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data *chip_data = NULL;
> > + struct irq_fwspec spec;
> > + irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> > + int tint = -EINVAL;
> > + unsigned int type;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = irq_domain_translate_twocell(domain, arg, &hwirq, &type);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * For TINIT interrupts ie where pinctrl driver is child of irqc domain
> > + * the hwirq and TINT are encoded in fwspec->param[0].
> > + * hwirq for TINIT range from 9-40, hwirq is embedded 0-15 bits and TINT
> > + * from 16-31 bits. TINIT from the pinctrl driver needs to be programmed
> > + * in IRQC registers to enable a given gpio pin as interrupt.
> > + */
> > + if (hwirq > IRQC_IRQ_COUNT) {
> > + tint = TINT_EXTRACT_GPIOINT(hwirq);
> > + hwirq = TINT_EXTRACT_HWIRQ(hwirq);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (hwirq > (IRQC_NUM_IRQ - 1))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (tint != -EINVAL && (hwirq < IRQC_TINT_START || hwirq > (IRQC_NUM_IRQ - 1)))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + chip_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!chip_data)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + chip_data->tint = tint;
> > +
> > + ret = irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq, hwirq, &irqc_chip,
> > + chip_data);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + kfree(chip_data);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + spec.fwnode = domain->parent->fwnode;
> > + spec.param_count = priv->map[hwirq].args_count;
> > + for (i = 0; i < spec.param_count; i++)
> > + spec.param[i] = priv->map[hwirq].args[i];
> > +
> > + ret = irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs, &spec);
> > + if (ret)
> > + kfree(chip_data);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rzg2l_irqc_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> > + unsigned int nr_irqs)
> > +{
> > + struct irq_data *d;
> > +
> > + d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
> > + if (d) {
> > + struct rzg2l_irqc_chip_data *chip_data = d->chip_data;
> > +
> > + kfree(chip_data);
> > + }
> > + irq_domain_free_irqs_common(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct irq_domain_ops rzg2l_irqc_domain_ops = {
> > + .alloc = rzg2l_irqc_alloc,
> > + .free = rzg2l_irqc_domain_free,
> > + .translate = irq_domain_translate_twocell,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int rzg2l_irqc_parse_map(struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv,
> > + struct device_node *np,
> > + struct device_node *parent)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int len, j;
> > + const __be32 *range;
> > +
> > + range = of_get_property(np, "interrupts", &len);
> > + if (!range)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + for (len /= sizeof(*range), j = 0; len >= 3; len -= 3) {
> > + if (j >= IRQC_NUM_IRQ)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + priv->map[j].args[0] = be32_to_cpu(*range++);
> > + priv->map[j].args[1] = be32_to_cpu(*range++);
> > + priv->map[j].args[2] = be32_to_cpu(*range++);
> > + priv->map[j].args_count = 3;
> > + j++;
> > + }
>
> I'm confused. Why do you have to invent a new interrupt parser? What
> is wrong with of_irq_parse_one() populating the of_phandle_args array?
> I expected to see something like:
>
> static void rzg2l_irqc_parse_map(struct rzg2l_irqc_priv *priv,
> struct device_node *np)
> {
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < IRQC_NUM_IRQ; i++)
> of_irq_parse_one(np, i, &priv->map[i]);
> }
>
> and that's it.
>
Agreed of_irq_parse_one() already does this (and ofcourse I need to
check the return value of of_irq_parse_one()).
Cheers,
Prabhakar
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists