linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] introduce fwnode in the I2C subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YjSyJaUa+uuv3+zc@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:24:05 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "'Rafael J . Wysocki '" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] introduce fwnode in the I2C subsystem

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:00:46PM +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> In order to allow the I2C subsystem to be usable with fwnode, add
> some functions to retrieve an i2c_adapter from a fwnode and use
> these functions in both i2c mux and sfp. ACPI and device-tree are
> handled to allow these modifications to work with both descriptions.
> 
> This series is a subset of the one that was first submitted as a larger
> series to add swnode support [1]. In this one, it will be focused on
> fwnode support only since it seems to have reach a consensus that
> adding fwnode to subsystems makes sense.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/YhPSkz8+BIcdb72R@smile.fi.intel.com/T/

I have got two copies (?) of the series. I have no idea which one is correct.
So, please take care of it and send the version we are supposed to review.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko