lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 18 Mar 2022 10:41:02 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] remoteproc: mediatek: Fix side effect of mt8195 sram
 power on

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 07:42:00PM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
> The definition of L1TCM_SRAM_PDN bits on mt8195 is different to mt8192.
> 
> L1TCM_SRAM_PDN bits[3:0] control the power of mt8195 L1TCM SRAM.
> 
> L1TCM_SRAM_PDN bits[7:4] control the access path to EMI for SCP.
> These bits have to be powered on to allow EMI access for SCP.
> 
> Bits[7:4] also affect audio DSP because audio DSP and SCP are
> placed on the same hardware bus. If SCP cannot access EMI, audio DSP is
> blocked too.
> 
> L1TCM_SRAM_PDN bits[31:8] are not used.
> 
> This fix removes modification of bits[7:4] when power on/off mt8195 SCP
> L1TCM. It's because the modification introduces a short period of time
> blocking audio DSP to access EMI. This was not a problem until we have
> to load both SCP module and audio DSP module. audio DSP needs to access
> EMI because it has source/data on DRAM. Audio DSP will have unexpected
> behavior when it accesses EMI and the SCP driver blocks the EMI path at
> the same time.
> 
> Fixes: 79111df414fc ("remoteproc: mediatek: Support mt8195 scp")
> Signed-off-by: Tinghan Shen <tinghan.shen@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
> 
> ---
> v5: rebased on rproc-next
> v4: add Fixes and Reviewed-by tags
> v3: fix build error
> v2: apply comments about macro definition and function calls
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h |  2 +
>  drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c    | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> index 71ce4977cb0b..ea6fa1100a00 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_common.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,8 @@
>  #define MT8192_CORE0_WDT_IRQ		0x10030
>  #define MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG		0x10034
>  
> +#define MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS		GENMASK(7, 4)
> +
>  #define SCP_FW_VER_LEN			32
>  #define SCP_SHARE_BUFFER_SIZE		288
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index 38609153bf64..068edf21ea51 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -365,22 +365,22 @@ static int mt8183_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void mt8192_power_on_sram(void __iomem *addr)
> +static void scp_sram_power_on(void __iomem *addr, u32 reserved_mask)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
>  	for (i = 31; i >= 0; i--)
> -		writel(GENMASK(i, 0), addr);
> +		writel(GENMASK(i, 0) & ~reserved_mask, addr);
>  	writel(0, addr);
>  }
>  
> -static void mt8192_power_off_sram(void __iomem *addr)
> +static void scp_sram_power_off(void __iomem *addr, u32 reserved_mask)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
>  	writel(0, addr);
>  	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++)
> -		writel(GENMASK(i, 0), addr);
> +		writel(GENMASK(i, 0) & ~reserved_mask, addr);
>  }
>  
>  static int mt8186_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> @@ -412,11 +412,32 @@ static int mt8192_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
>  
>  	/* enable SRAM clock */
> -	mt8192_power_on_sram(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0);
> -	mt8192_power_on_sram(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1);
> -	mt8192_power_on_sram(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2);
> -	mt8192_power_on_sram(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN);
> -	mt8192_power_on_sram(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
> +
> +	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
> +	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mt8195_scp_before_load(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> +{
> +	/* clear SPM interrupt, SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR */
> +	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_SCP2SPM_IPC_CLR);
> +
> +	writel(1, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_SW_RSTN_SET);
> +
> +	/* enable SRAM clock */
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
> +			  MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
> +	scp_sram_power_on(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
>  	/* enable MPU for all memory regions */
>  	writel(0xff, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_MEM_ATT_PREDEF);
> @@ -572,11 +593,25 @@ static void mt8183_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  static void mt8192_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
>  {
>  	/* Disable SRAM clock */
> -	mt8192_power_off_sram(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0);
> -	mt8192_power_off_sram(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1);
> -	mt8192_power_off_sram(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2);
> -	mt8192_power_off_sram(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN);
> -	mt8192_power_off_sram(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
> +
> +	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
> +	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
> +}
> +
> +static void mt8195_scp_stop(struct mtk_scp *scp)
> +{
> +	/* Disable SRAM clock */
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_0, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_1, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L2TCM_SRAM_PD_2, 0);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN,
> +			   MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS);
> +	scp_sram_power_off(scp->reg_base + MT8192_CPU0_SRAM_PD, 0);
>  
>  	/* Disable SCP watchdog */
>  	writel(0, scp->reg_base + MT8192_CORE0_WDT_CFG);
> @@ -922,11 +957,11 @@ static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8192_of_data = {
>  
>  static const struct mtk_scp_of_data mt8195_of_data = {
>  	.scp_clk_get = mt8195_scp_clk_get,
> -	.scp_before_load = mt8192_scp_before_load,
> +	.scp_before_load = mt8195_scp_before_load,
>  	.scp_irq_handler = mt8192_scp_irq_handler,
>  	.scp_reset_assert = mt8192_scp_reset_assert,
>  	.scp_reset_deassert = mt8192_scp_reset_deassert,
> -	.scp_stop = mt8192_scp_stop,
> +	.scp_stop = mt8195_scp_stop,
>  	.scp_da_to_va = mt8192_scp_da_to_va,
>  	.host_to_scp_reg = MT8192_GIPC_IN_SET,
>  	.host_to_scp_int_bit = MT8192_HOST_IPC_INT_BIT,


  GEN     Makefile
  UPD     include/config/kernel.release
  UPD     include/generated/utsrelease.h
  CALL    /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
  CALL    /home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/scripts/checksyscalls.sh
  CHK     include/generated/compile.h
  CC      init/version.o
  AR      init/built-in.a
  CC      kernel/sys.o
  CC      net/ethtool/ioctl.o
  CC      kernel/module.o
  CC      kernel/trace/trace.o
  CC      drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.o
  CC      drivers/base/firmware_loader/builtin/main.o
  AR      net/ethtool/built-in.a
  AR      drivers/base/firmware_loader/builtin/built-in.a
  AR      net/built-in.a
  AR      drivers/base/firmware_loader/built-in.a
  AR      drivers/base/built-in.a
  CC      drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.o
  CC      drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp_ipi.o
  CC      drivers/ras/ras.o
  CC      drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.o
  CC      drivers/nvmem/core.o
  AR      kernel/trace/built-in.a
  AR      kernel/built-in.a
/home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c: In function ‘mt8186_scp_before_load’:
/home/mpoirier/work/remoteproc/kernel-review/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:396:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mt8192_power_on_sram’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  396 |  mt8192_power_on_sram(scp->reg_base + MT8183_SCP_SRAM_PDN);
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
...

No need to send me another revision right away - I won't apply your code for
this merge window.

> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ