linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] i2c: mux: pinctrl: remove CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220318175630.0e235f41@fixe.home>
Date:   Fri, 18 Mar 2022 17:56:30 +0100
From:   Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "'Rafael J . Wysocki '" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] i2c: mux: pinctrl: remove CONFIG_OF dependency and
 use fwnode API

Le Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:28:45 +0200,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> a écrit :

> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:00:50PM +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> > In order to use i2c muxes with software_node when added with a struct
> > mfd_cell, switch to fwnode API. The fwnode layer will allow to use this
> > with both device_node and software_node.  
> 
> > -	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > +	struct fwnode_handle *np = dev_fwnode(dev);  
> 
> np is now a misleading name. Use fwnode.
> 

Ok I thought np was meaning "node pointer" and it looked like okay to
avoid avoid a diff that is too huge. But agreed, I'll rename that.

-- 
Clément Léger,
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineer at Bootlin
https://bootlin.com