[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220318175952.449ff4fb@fixe.home>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 17:59:52 +0100
From: Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"'Rafael J . Wysocki '" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] introduce fwnode in the I2C subsystem
Le Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:24:05 +0200,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:00:46PM +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> > In order to allow the I2C subsystem to be usable with fwnode, add
> > some functions to retrieve an i2c_adapter from a fwnode and use
> > these functions in both i2c mux and sfp. ACPI and device-tree are
> > handled to allow these modifications to work with both descriptions.
> >
> > This series is a subset of the one that was first submitted as a larger
> > series to add swnode support [1]. In this one, it will be focused on
> > fwnode support only since it seems to have reach a consensus that
> > adding fwnode to subsystems makes sense.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/YhPSkz8+BIcdb72R@smile.fi.intel.com/T/
>
> I have got two copies (?) of the series. I have no idea which one is correct.
> So, please take care of it and send the version we are supposed to review.
>
Sorry for that, both are identical and were unfortunately provided
twice to git send-email...
I'll be more cautious next time.
--
Clément Léger,
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineer at Bootlin
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists