linux-kernel - Re: zram corruption due to uninitialized do_swap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YjTCF37cUNz9FwGi@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Mar 2022 10:32:07 -0700
From:   Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:     Ivan Babrou <ivan@...udflare.com>
Cc:     Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: zram corruption due to uninitialized do_swap_page fault

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 09:30:09AM -0700, Ivan Babrou wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:26 AM Ivan Babrou <ivan@...udflare.com> wrote:
> > I'm making an internal build and will push it to some location to see
> > how it behaves, but it might take a few days to get any sort of
> > confidence in the results (unless it breaks immediately).
> >
> > I've also pushed my patch that disables SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO to a few
> > locations yesterday to see how it fares.
> 
> I have some updates before the weekend. There are two experimental groups:
> 
> * My patch that removes the SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO flag. There are 704
> machines in this group across 5 datacenters with cumulative uptime of
> 916 days.
> * Minchan's patch to remove swap_slot_free_notify. There are 376
> machines in this group across 3 datacenters with cumulative uptime of
> 240 days.
> 
> Our machines take a couple of hours to start swapping anything after
> boot, and I discounted these two hours from the cumulative uptime.
> 
> Neither of these two groups experienced unexpected coredumps or
> rocksdb corruptions.
> 
> I think at this point it's reasonable to proceed with Minchan's patch
> (including a backport).

Let me cook the patch and then will post it.

Thanks for the testing as well as reporting, Ivan!