[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4wW-SUPZ+soz5L+TROcmWtiYoABMcYzNyw4p=f2ro9vLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 23:14:45 +1300
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Michael Larabel <Michael@...haellarabel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@...el.com>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Kernel Page Reclaim v2 <page-reclaim@...gle.com>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, Brian Geffon <bgeffon@...gle.com>,
Jan Alexander Steffens <heftig@...hlinux.org>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Steven Barrett <steven@...uorix.net>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Daniel Byrne <djbyrne@....edu>,
Donald Carr <d@...os-reins.com>,
Holger Hoffstätte <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>,
Konstantin Kharlamov <Hi-Angel@...dex.ru>,
Shuang Zhai <szhai2@...rochester.edu>,
Sofia Trinh <sofia.trinh@....works>,
Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: minimal implementation
> +static void inc_max_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long max_seq)
> +{
> + int prev, next;
> + int type, zone;
> + struct lru_gen_struct *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
> +
> + VM_BUG_ON(!seq_is_valid(lruvec));
> +
> + if (max_seq != lrugen->max_seq)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + inc_min_seq(lruvec);
> +
> + /* update the active/inactive LRU sizes for compatibility */
> + prev = lru_gen_from_seq(lrugen->max_seq - 1);
> + next = lru_gen_from_seq(lrugen->max_seq + 1);
> +
> + for (type = 0; type < ANON_AND_FILE; type++) {
> + for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
> + enum lru_list lru = type * LRU_INACTIVE_FILE;
> + long delta = lrugen->nr_pages[prev][type][zone] -
> + lrugen->nr_pages[next][type][zone];
this is confusing to me. does lrugen->nr_pages[next][type][zone] have a
chance to be none-zero even before max_seq is increased? some pages
can be in the next generation before the generation is born?
isn't it a bug if(lrugen->nr_pages[next][type][zone] > 0)? shouldn't it be?
delta = lrugen->nr_pages[prev][type][zone];
> +
> + if (!delta)
> + continue;
> +
> + __update_lru_size(lruvec, lru, zone, delta);
> + __update_lru_size(lruvec, lru + LRU_ACTIVE, zone, -delta);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + for (type = 0; type < ANON_AND_FILE; type++)
> + reset_ctrl_pos(lruvec, type, false);
> +
> + /* make sure preceding modifications appear */
> + smp_store_release(&lrugen->max_seq, lrugen->max_seq + 1);
> +unlock:
> + spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
> +}
Thanks
Barry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists