[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220320004429.GD13956@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2022 01:44:29 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Brian Johannesmeyer <bjohannesmeyer@...il.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_tables: replace unnecessary use of
list_for_each_entry_continue()
Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com> wrote:
> Since there is no way for the previous list_for_each_entry() to exit
> early, this call to list_for_each_entry_continue() is always guaranteed
> to start with the first element of the list and can therefore be
> replaced with a call to list_for_each_entry().
>
> In preparation to limit the scope of the list iterator to the list
> traversal loop, the list iterator variable 'rule' should not be used
> past the loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
>
> - list_for_each_entry_continue(rule, &chain->rules, list) {
> + list_for_each_entry(rule, &chain->rules, list) {
> if (!nft_is_active_next(net, rule))
> continue;
You could also replace the first entry_continue and get rid of the
preceeding
rule = list_entry().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists