[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae21bbb1-9794-77e5-bd02-fad77096fa1d@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2022 21:40:07 +0800
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Yi Li <yili@...hong.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: yilikernel@...il.com, jlbec@...lplan.org, mark@...heh.com,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: refactor the noqueue_attempted
Don't see any optimization after this change.
On 3/19/22 2:10 PM, Yi Li wrote:
> The variable noqueue_attempted just set when DLM_LKF_NOQUEUE.
> refactor the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Li <yili@...hong.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> index 801e60bab955..6315757c164d 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
> @@ -1547,12 +1547,11 @@ static int __ocfs2_cluster_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb,
> }
>
> if (level > lockres->l_level) {
> - if (noqueue_attempted > 0) {
> + if (noqueue_attempted) {
> ret = -EAGAIN;
> goto unlock;
> }
> - if (lkm_flags & DLM_LKF_NOQUEUE)
> - noqueue_attempted = 1;
> + noqueue_attempted = lkm_flags & DLM_LKF_NOQUEUE;
>
> if (lockres->l_action != OCFS2_AST_INVALID)
> mlog(ML_ERROR, "lockres %s has action %u pending\n",
Powered by blists - more mailing lists