[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ba9c8bd-d4e1-a9c5-9269-4cecb1b109f6@gnuweeb.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2022 22:09:00 +0700
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
To: Alviro Iskandar Setiawan <alviro.iskandar@...weeb.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Nugraha <richiisei@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org>,
x86@...nel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/6] tools/nolibc: i386: Implement syscall with 6
arguments
On 3/20/22 5:42 PM, Alviro Iskandar Setiawan wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 5:33 PM Alviro Iskandar Setiawan wrote:
[...]
>> I don't think you can safely use redzone from inline Assembly. The
>> compiler may also use redzone for a leaf function. In case the syscall
>> is done at the same time, your %ebp saving will clobber the redzone
>> that the compiler uses.
It turned out we don't have a redzone for 32-bit.
>>
>> -4(%esp) may be used by the compiler on a leaf call, you can't clobber that.
Yeah, this is still wrong even with a redzone.
> Using xchgl to preserve %ebp in the same place where the arg6 is
> stored in memory is a better solution and doesn't clobber anything.
>
> xchgl %ebp, %[arg6]
> int $0x80
> xchgl %ebp, %[arg6]
Addressed your review in my response to David.
Thanks!
--
Ammar Faizi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists