linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] iio: accel: bma400: Add separate channel for step counter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220320173021.220ee3c6@jic23-huawei>
Date:   Sun, 20 Mar 2022 17:30:21 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>
Cc:     dan@...obertson.com, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] iio: accel: bma400: Add separate channel for
 step counter

On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 23:40:22 +0530
Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com> wrote:

> Added channel for step counter which can be enable or disable
> through the sysfs interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>
hi Jagath,

Been a long time since we had a steps counter. Good to have 
support on another device.

One minor thing inline, but otherwise looks good to me.

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/accel/bma400.h      |  1 +
>  drivers/iio/accel/bma400_core.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bma400.h b/drivers/iio/accel/bma400.h
> index b306a5ad513a..65bbc80cbb7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bma400.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bma400.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
>  #define BMA400_STEP_CNT1_REG        0x16
>  #define BMA400_STEP_CNT3_REG        0x17
>  #define BMA400_STEP_STAT_REG        0x18
> +#define BMA400_STEP_INT_MSK         BIT(0)
>  
>  /*
>   * Read-write configuration registers
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bma400_core.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bma400_core.c
> index 797403c7dd85..305643e99eb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bma400_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bma400_core.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct bma400_data {
>  	int oversampling_ratio;
>  	int scale;
>  	struct iio_trigger *trig;
> +	int steps_enabled;
>  	/* Correct time stamp alignment */
>  	struct {
>  		__be16 buff[3];
> @@ -202,6 +203,13 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec bma400_channels[] = {
>  			.endianness = IIO_LE,
>  		},
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.type = IIO_STEPS,
> +		.info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED) |
> +				      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_ENABLE),
> +		.scan_index = -1, /* No buffer support */
> +	},
> +
>  	IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP(4),
>  };
>  
> @@ -686,13 +694,28 @@ static int bma400_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  {
>  	struct bma400_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  	int ret;
> +	u32 steps_raw;
>  
>  	switch (mask) {
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED:
> -		mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
> -		ret = bma400_get_temp_reg(data, val, val2);
> -		mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> -		return ret;
> +		switch (chan->type) {
> +		case IIO_STEPS:
> +			mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
> +			ret = regmap_bulk_read(data->regmap, BMA400_STEP_CNT0_REG,
> +					       &steps_raw, 3 * sizeof(u8));
> +			mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> +			if (ret)
> +				return ret;
> +			*val = steps_raw & 0x00FFFFFF;

No need for an endian conversion in here?  I'd also intialize steps_raw = 0 before
the bulk read then you shouldn't need to mask as you only read 3 bytes in.

> +			return IIO_VAL_INT;
> +		case IIO_TEMP:
> +			mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
> +			ret = bma400_get_temp_reg(data, val, val2);
> +			mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> +			return ret;
> +		default:
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
>  		mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
>  		ret = bma400_get_accel_reg(data, chan, val);
> @@ -733,6 +756,9 @@ static int bma400_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  
>  		*val = data->oversampling_ratio;
>  		return IIO_VAL_INT;
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_ENABLE:
> +		*val = data->steps_enabled;
> +		return IIO_VAL_INT;
>  	default:
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> @@ -798,6 +824,17 @@ static int bma400_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  		ret = bma400_set_accel_oversampling_ratio(data, val);
>  		mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
>  		return ret;
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_ENABLE:
> +		if (data->steps_enabled == val)
> +			return 0;
> +
> +		mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
> +		ret = regmap_update_bits(data->regmap, BMA400_INT_CONFIG1_REG,
> +					 BMA400_STEP_INT_MSK,
> +					 FIELD_PREP(BMA400_STEP_INT_MSK, !!val));
> +		mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> +		data->steps_enabled = val;
> +		return ret;
>  	default:
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> @@ -814,6 +851,8 @@ static int bma400_write_raw_get_fmt(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  		return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO:
>  		return IIO_VAL_INT;
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_ENABLE:
> +		return IIO_VAL_INT;
>  	default:
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}