lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjedJxNNv8KifAKd@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 20 Mar 2022 23:31:19 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     Nayna <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Nageswara Sastry <rnsastry@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        dhowells@...hat.com, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dimitri.ledkov@...onical.com,
        seth@...shee.me, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/4] integrity: support including firmware
 ".platform" keys at build time

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:25:07PM -0400, Nayna wrote:
> 
> On 3/17/22 03:38, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 04:03:12PM -0500, Nayna wrote:
> > > On 3/11/22 11:42, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > ".platform" keyring.
> > > > > > Changelog:
> > > > > > v11:
> > > > > > * Added a new patch to conditionally build extract-cert if
> > > > > > PLATFORM_KEYRING is enabled.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > Tested the following four patches with and with out setting
> > > > > CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYS
> > > > > 
> > > > > Tested-by: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > > OK, I added it:
> > > > 
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git
> > > Thanks Jarkko. Masahiro Yamada would prefer to revert the original commit
> > > 340a02535ee785c64c62a9c45706597a0139e972 i.e. move extract-cert back to the
> > > scripts/ directory.
> > > 
> > > I am just posting v12 which includes Masahiro feedback. Nageswara has
> > > already tested v12 version as well.
> > > 
> > > I am fine either way 1.) Adding v11 and then separately handling of
> > > reverting of the commit or 2.) Adding v12 version which includes the revert.
> > > I leave the decision on you as to which one to upstream.
> > > 
> > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > 
> > >      - Nayna
> > > 
> > I already sent PR for v5.18. Too many late changes to include this, which
> > means that v12 is the way to go.
> 
> Assuming v12 looks good, could you please queue it now ?
> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> 
>     - Nayna
> 

Unfortunately, I've already sent my v5.18 PR over a week ago. I can put it
to my queue but I think it is lacking some of the tested by tags, doesn't
it?

BR, Jarkko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ