[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6919f0a9-b3e0-b5c3-0669-4b84beed84a6@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:10:09 +1100
From: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@...cle.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 1/8] kernfs: Introduce interface to access
global kernfs_open_file_mutex.
Hello Eric,
Thanks for reviewing this.
On 19/3/22 4:10 am, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@...cle.com> writes:
>
[...]
>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kernfs_open_node_lock);
>> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(kernfs_open_file_mutex);
>> +DEFINE_MUTEX(kernfs_open_file_mutex);
> ^^^^^????
>
> Why when you want things more localized are you making a lock more
> global?
The idea was to keep the interface in kernfs-internal.h. But since this
mutex is used only in kernfs/file.c, I can keep the mutex static and
bring interfaces that access this mutex in kernfs/file.c. This will
cover your other query as well.
>> diff --git a/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h b/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
>> index eeaa779b929c..df00a5f5a367 100644
>> --- a/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
>> +++ b/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
>> @@ -164,4 +164,22 @@ void kernfs_drain_open_files(struct kernfs_node *kn);
>> */
>> extern const struct inode_operations kernfs_symlink_iops;
>>
>> +extern struct mutex kernfs_open_file_mutex;
>> +
>> +static inline struct mutex *kernfs_open_file_mutex_ptr(struct kernfs_node *kn)
>> +{
>> + return &kernfs_open_file_mutex;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline struct mutex *kernfs_open_file_mutex_lock(struct kernfs_node *kn)
>> +{
>> + struct mutex *lock;
>> +
>> + lock = kernfs_open_file_mutex_ptr(kn);
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(lock);
>> +
>> + return lock;
>> +}
>
> Why don't these functions live in fs/kern/fs/file.c
>
I can put these in kernfs/file.c. Please see earlier comment.
Thanks,
-- Imran
Powered by blists - more mailing lists