[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de543fbc-0051-120b-c91a-74cf4dd6156b@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 17:15:06 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Donald Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@...wei.com>,
Pedro Gomes <pedrodemargomes@...il.com>,
Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/15] mm: support GUP-triggered unsharing of anonymous
pages
On 19.03.22 00:30, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:47:39AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Whenever GUP currently ends up taking a R/O pin on an anonymous page that
>> might be shared -- mapped R/O and !PageAnonExclusive() -- any write fault
>> on the page table entry will end up replacing the mapped anonymous page
>> due to COW, resulting in the GUP pin no longer being consistent with the
>> page actually mapped into the page table.
>>
>> The possible ways to deal with this situation are:
>> (1) Ignore and pin -- what we do right now.
>> (2) Fail to pin -- which would be rather surprising to callers and
>> could break user space.
>> (3) Trigger unsharing and pin the now exclusive page -- reliable R/O
>> pins.
>>
>> We want to implement 3) because it provides the clearest semantics and
>> allows for checking in unpin_user_pages() and friends for possible BUGs:
>> when trying to unpin a page that's no longer exclusive, clearly
>> something went very wrong and might result in memory corruptions that
>> might be hard to debug. So we better have a nice way to spot such
>> issues.
>>
>> To implement 3), we need a way for GUP to trigger unsharing:
>> FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE. FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE is only applicable to R/O mapped
>> anonymous pages and resembles COW logic during a write fault. However, in
>> contrast to a write fault, GUP-triggered unsharing will, for example, still
>> maintain the write protection.
>
> Given the way this series has developed you might want to call this
> FAULT_FLAG_MAKE_ANON_EXCLUSIVE
>
> Which strikes me as more directly connected to what it is trying to
> do.
I thought about something similar along those lines, and I think it
would apply even when extending that mechanism to anything !anon inside
a MAP_PRIVATE mapping.
The whole
const bool unshare = vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE;
would get a little more verbose, though
const bool make_anon_exclusive = vmf->flags &
FAULT_FLAG_MAKE_ANON_EXCLUSIVE;
No strong opinion, any other opinions or alternatives?
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists