linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wigO=68WA8aMZnH9o8qRUJQbNJPERosvW82YuScrUTo7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:37:35 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
        "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        linux-toolchains <linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the tip tree

On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 8:46 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> This landing in -next only today (after having been committed last
> friday night) is another clue it should probably go next round.

I went and looked at lore to get the context that I didn't get in this
email that I was added to the participants for.

I didn't find the context there either.

Sure, I found the thread, but the whole "that x86 patch" that you
refer to was never actually specified even in the full thread as far
as I can tell. I see that there is an arm64 equivalent too of what you
are complaining about, and I have no idea about that one either..

Mind actually giving the full details so that we don't have to go
re-do the work you already did?

Because right now I know something is wrong, I know the warnings, but
I don't actually have any handle on the actual patches to look out
for.

It's presumably not in any of the pull requests I already have
pending, but it would be nice if I saw some details of _what_ you are
complaining about, and not just the complaint itself ;)

                     Linus