[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e52c8cbd-031b-848f-3d78-dff8b93bd416@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 20:06:40 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Toan Le <toan@...amperecomputing.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Stéphane Graber <stgraber@...ntu.com>,
dann frazier <dann.frazier@...onical.com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI: xgene: Restore working PCIe functionnality
On 2022-03-21 19:21, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 18:03:27 +0000,
> Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 11:36 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:17:34 +0000,
>>> Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 5:49 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> For XGene-1, I'd still like to understand what the issue is. Reverting
>>>> the first fix and fixing 'dma-ranges' should have fixed it. I need a
>>>> dump of how the IB registers are initialized in both cases. I'm not
>>>> saying changing 'dma-ranges' in the firmware is going to be required
>>>> here. There's a couple of other ways we could fix that without a
>>>> firmware change, but first I need to understand why it broke.
>>>
>>> Reverting 6dce5aa59e0b was enough for me, without changing anything
>>> else.
>>
>> Meaning c7a75d07827a didn't matter for you. I'm not sure that it would.
>>
>> Can you tell me what 'dma-ranges' contains on your system?
>
> Each pcie node (all 5 of them) has:
>
> dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x80 0x00 0x80 0x00 0x00 0x80000000
> 0x42000000 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x80 0x00>;
Hmm, is there anyone other than iommu-dma who actually depends on the
resource list being sorted in ascending order of bus address? I recall
at the time I pushed for creating the list in sorted order as it was the
simplest and most efficient option, but there's no technical reason we
couldn't create it in as-found order and defer the sorting until
iova_reserve_pci_windows() (at worst that could even operate on a
temporary copy if need be). It's just more code, which didn't need to
exist without a good reason, but if this is one then exist it certainly may.
Cheers,
Robin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists