[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220321212012.GB10058@jagath-PC>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 02:50:13 +0530
From: Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Robertson <dan@...obertson.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] iio: accel: bma400: conversion to device-managed
function
Hello Andy,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:30:26AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 8:10 PM Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is a conversion to device-managed by using devm_iio_device_register
> > inside probe function, now disabling the regulator and putting bma400 to
> > power down via a devm_add_action_or_reset() hook.
> >
> > The dev_set_drvdata() call, bma400_remove() function and hooks in the I2C
> > and SPI driver struct is removed as devm_iio_device_register function is
> > used to automatically unregister on driver detach.
>
> ...
>
> > +static void bma400_disable(void *data_ptr)
> > +{
> > + struct bma400_data *data = data_ptr;
> > + int ret;
>
> > + ret = bma400_set_power_mode(data, POWER_MODE_SLEEP);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_warn(data->dev, "Failed to put device into sleep mode (%pe)\n",
> > + ERR_PTR(ret));
>
> By what reason did you remove mutex around this call?
>
> > + regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(data->regulators), data->regulators);
> > +}
Sorry my mistake, I missed this.
I will include the mutex calls in next patch version.
>
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists