linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/papr_scm: Fix build failure when CONFIG_PERF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4iqpTn89WLOW1XjFXGZEYG_MmPg+VQbcDJ9ygJ4Jaybtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:39:23 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@...six.org>, maddy@...ux.ibm.com,
        rnsastry@...ux.ibm.com,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/papr_scm: Fix build failure when
 CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS is not set

On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 4:42 AM Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> The following build failure occures when CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS is not set
> as generic pmu functions are not visible in that scenario.
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:372:35: error: ‘struct perf_event’ has no member named ‘attr’
>          p->nvdimm_events_map[event->attr.config],
>                                    ^~
> In file included from ./include/linux/list.h:5,
>                  from ./include/linux/kobject.h:19,
>                  from ./include/linux/of.h:17,
>                  from arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:5:
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c: In function ‘papr_scm_pmu_event_init’:
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:389:49: error: ‘struct perf_event’ has no member named ‘pmu’
>   struct nvdimm_pmu *nd_pmu = to_nvdimm_pmu(event->pmu);
>                                                  ^~
> ./include/linux/container_of.h:18:26: note: in definition of macro ‘container_of’
>   void *__mptr = (void *)(ptr);     \
>                           ^~~
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:389:30: note: in expansion of macro ‘to_nvdimm_pmu’
>   struct nvdimm_pmu *nd_pmu = to_nvdimm_pmu(event->pmu);
>                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from ./include/linux/bits.h:22,
>                  from ./include/linux/bitops.h:6,
>                  from ./include/linux/of.h:15,
>                  from arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:5:
>
> Fix the build issue by adding check for CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS config option
> and disabling the papr_scm perf interface support incase this config
> is not set
>
> Fixes: 4c08d4bbc089 ("powerpc/papr_scm: Add perf interface support") (Commit id
> based on linux-next tree)
> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 15 +++++++++++++++

This is a bit messier than I would have liked mainly because it dumps
a bunch of ifdefery into a C file contrary to coding style, "Wherever
possible, don't use preprocessor conditionals (#if, #ifdef) in .c
files". I would expect this all to move to an organization like:

arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm/main.c
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm/perf.c

...and a new config symbol like:

config PAPR_SCM_PERF
       depends on PAPR_SCM && PERF_EVENTS
       def_bool y

...with wrappers in header files to make everything compile away
without any need for main.c to carry an ifdef.

Can you turn a patch like that in the next couple days? Otherwise, I
think if Linus saw me sending a late breaking compile fix that threw
coding style out the window he'd have cause to just drop the pull
request entirely.