| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 17:52:32 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, nikita@...n.ru,
song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.16 1/6] Input: zinitix - do not report shadow fingers
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
[ Upstream commit e941dc13fd3717122207d74539ab95da07ef797f ]
I observed the following problem with the BT404 touch pad
running the Phosh UI:
When e.g. typing on the virtual keyboard pressing "g" would
produce "ggg".
After some analysis it turns out the firmware reports that three
fingers hit that coordinate at the same time, finger 0, 2 and
4 (of the five available 0,1,2,3,4).
DOWN
Zinitix-TS 3-0020: finger 0 down (246, 395)
Zinitix-TS 3-0020: finger 1 up (0, 0)
Zinitix-TS 3-0020: finger 2 down (246, 395)
Zinitix-TS 3-0020: finger 3 up (0, 0)
Zinitix-TS 3-0020: finger 4 down (246, 395)
UP
Zinitix-TS 3-0020: finger 0 up (246, 395)
Zinitix-TS 3-0020: finger 2 up (246, 395)
Zinitix-TS 3-0020: finger 4 up (246, 395)
This is one touch and release: i.e. this is all reported on
touch (down) and release.
There is a field in the struct touch_event called finger_cnt
which is actually a bitmask of the fingers active in the
event.
Rename this field finger_mask as this matches the use contents
better, then use for_each_set_bit() to iterate over just the
fingers that are actally active.
Factor out a finger reporting function zinitix_report_fingers()
to handle all fingers.
Also be more careful in reporting finger down/up: we were
reporting every event with input_mt_report_slot_state(..., true);
but this should only be reported on finger down or move,
not on finger up, so also add code to check p->sub_status
to see what is happening and report correctly.
After this my Zinitix BT404 touchscreen report fingers
flawlessly.
The vendor drive I have notably does not use the "finger_cnt"
and contains obviously incorrect code like this:
if (touch_dev->touch_info.finger_cnt > MAX_SUPPORTED_FINGER_NUM)
touch_dev->touch_info.finger_cnt = MAX_SUPPORTED_FINGER_NUM;
As MAX_SUPPORTED_FINGER_NUM is an ordinal and the field is
a bitmask this seems quite confused.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220228233017.2270599-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/input/touchscreen/zinitix.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/zinitix.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/zinitix.c
index 1e70b8d2a8d7..400957f4c8c9 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/zinitix.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/zinitix.c
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ struct point_coord {
struct touch_event {
__le16 status;
- u8 finger_cnt;
+ u8 finger_mask;
u8 time_stamp;
struct point_coord point_coord[MAX_SUPPORTED_FINGER_NUM];
};
@@ -311,11 +311,32 @@ static int zinitix_send_power_on_sequence(struct bt541_ts_data *bt541)
static void zinitix_report_finger(struct bt541_ts_data *bt541, int slot,
const struct point_coord *p)
{
+ u16 x, y;
+
+ if (unlikely(!(p->sub_status &
+ (SUB_BIT_UP | SUB_BIT_DOWN | SUB_BIT_MOVE)))) {
+ dev_dbg(&bt541->client->dev, "unknown finger event %#02x\n",
+ p->sub_status);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ x = le16_to_cpu(p->x);
+ y = le16_to_cpu(p->y);
+
input_mt_slot(bt541->input_dev, slot);
- input_mt_report_slot_state(bt541->input_dev, MT_TOOL_FINGER, true);
- touchscreen_report_pos(bt541->input_dev, &bt541->prop,
- le16_to_cpu(p->x), le16_to_cpu(p->y), true);
- input_report_abs(bt541->input_dev, ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR, p->width);
+ if (input_mt_report_slot_state(bt541->input_dev, MT_TOOL_FINGER,
+ !(p->sub_status & SUB_BIT_UP))) {
+ touchscreen_report_pos(bt541->input_dev,
+ &bt541->prop, x, y, true);
+ input_report_abs(bt541->input_dev,
+ ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR, p->width);
+ dev_dbg(&bt541->client->dev, "finger %d %s (%u, %u)\n",
+ slot, p->sub_status & SUB_BIT_DOWN ? "down" : "move",
+ x, y);
+ } else {
+ dev_dbg(&bt541->client->dev, "finger %d up (%u, %u)\n",
+ slot, x, y);
+ }
}
static irqreturn_t zinitix_ts_irq_handler(int irq, void *bt541_handler)
@@ -323,6 +344,7 @@ static irqreturn_t zinitix_ts_irq_handler(int irq, void *bt541_handler)
struct bt541_ts_data *bt541 = bt541_handler;
struct i2c_client *client = bt541->client;
struct touch_event touch_event;
+ unsigned long finger_mask;
int error;
int i;
@@ -335,10 +357,14 @@ static irqreturn_t zinitix_ts_irq_handler(int irq, void *bt541_handler)
goto out;
}
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_SUPPORTED_FINGER_NUM; i++)
- if (touch_event.point_coord[i].sub_status & SUB_BIT_EXIST)
- zinitix_report_finger(bt541, i,
- &touch_event.point_coord[i]);
+ finger_mask = touch_event.finger_mask;
+ for_each_set_bit(i, &finger_mask, MAX_SUPPORTED_FINGER_NUM) {
+ const struct point_coord *p = &touch_event.point_coord[i];
+
+ /* Only process contacts that are actually reported */
+ if (p->sub_status & SUB_BIT_EXIST)
+ zinitix_report_finger(bt541, i, p);
+ }
input_mt_sync_frame(bt541->input_dev);
input_sync(bt541->input_dev);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists