[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BL1PR11MB52714F57E430FCBE97DDAB478C169@BL1PR11MB5271.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:04:49 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@...dia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>
CC: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC 06/11] iommu/sva: Use attach/detach_pasid_dev in SVA
interfaces
> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 2:40 PM
> +struct iommu_sva *
> +iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, void
> *drvdata)
> +{
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> + struct iommu_sva *handle;
> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> +
> + handle = kzalloc(sizeof(*handle), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!handle)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + ret = iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(mm, 1, (1U << dev->iommu->pasid_bits)
> - 1);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + domain = iommu_sva_domain_alloc(dev);
> + if (!domain) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + domain->sva_cookie = mm;
one domain can be attached by multiple devices, so this should not be
a blind alloc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists