lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220321081559.GF3293@kadam>
Date:   Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:15:59 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
        Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: remove local BIT macro

This version is better, thanks!

Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

What the GCC devs should have done is run their checker on real code and
silence the common false positives.  There are a few ways to do this.
You could make ~ a special case.  They already ignore truncated sign
extension so they could equally well ignore truncation when all it's a
32 bits which are all set to 1.  Probably the best answer is to do both.

Sure, you might miss some bugs that way, but anyone relying on GCC to
find *all* their bugs is a moron.

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ