[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vem7DS1oXRt=d78pKe4WEWVOJ7uR8p9r33H5Ws9Rz4Qmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:30:26 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Robertson <dan@...obertson.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] iio: accel: bma400: conversion to device-managed function
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 8:10 PM Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This is a conversion to device-managed by using devm_iio_device_register
> inside probe function, now disabling the regulator and putting bma400 to
> power down via a devm_add_action_or_reset() hook.
>
> The dev_set_drvdata() call, bma400_remove() function and hooks in the I2C
> and SPI driver struct is removed as devm_iio_device_register function is
> used to automatically unregister on driver detach.
...
> +static void bma400_disable(void *data_ptr)
> +{
> + struct bma400_data *data = data_ptr;
> + int ret;
> + ret = bma400_set_power_mode(data, POWER_MODE_SLEEP);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_warn(data->dev, "Failed to put device into sleep mode (%pe)\n",
> + ERR_PTR(ret));
By what reason did you remove mutex around this call?
> + regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(data->regulators), data->regulators);
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists