linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] support USB offload feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YjhB7+AaEXvuUmdi@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:14:23 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daehwan Jung <dh10.jung@...sung.com>
Cc:     Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        "open list:USB XHCI DRIVER" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Howard Yen <howardyen@...gle.com>,
        Jack Pham <jackp@...eaurora.org>,
        Puma Hsu <pumahsu@...gle.com>,
        "J . Avila" <elavila@...gle.com>, sc.suh@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] support USB offload feature

On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 05:59:50PM +0900, Daehwan Jung wrote:
> This patchset is for USB offload feature, which makes Co-processor to use
> some memories of xhci. Especially it's useful for USB Audio scenario.
> Audio stream would get shortcut because Co-processor directly write/read
> data in xhci memories. It could get speed-up using faster memory like SRAM.
> That's why this gives vendors flexibilty of memory management.
> Several pathches have been merged in AOSP kernel(android12-5.10) and I put
> together and split into 3 patches. Plus let me add user(xhci-exynos)
> module to see how user could use it.
> 
> To sum up, it's for providing xhci memories to Co-Processor.
> It would cover DCBAA, Device Context, Transfer Ring, Event Ring, ERST.
> It needs xhci hooks and to export some xhci symbols.
> 
> Changes in v2 :
> - Fix commit message by adding Signed-off-by in each patch.
> - Fix conflict on latest.
> 
> Changes in v3 :
> - Remove export symbols and xhci hooks which xhci-exynos don't need.
> - Modify commit message to clarify why it needs to export symbols.
> - Check compiling of xhci-exynos.

As I asked for in the previous submission, you MUST have a user for
these hooks, otherwise we can not accept them (nor would you WANT us to
accept them).  Please fix that up and add them to the next submission as
we can not do anything with this one.

thanks,

greg k-h