[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d306244-748e-9774-8578-525073770a3f@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 17:25:51 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>, <mgorman@...e.de>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy: fix potential mpol_new leak in
shared_policy_replace
On 2022/3/21 16:59, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 19-03-22 18:42:33, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> [...]
>> This would be triggered easily with below code snippet in my virtual machine:
>>
>> shmid = shmget((key_t)5566, 1024 * PAGE_SIZE, 0666|IPC_CREAT);
>> shm = shmat(shmid, 0, 0);
>> loop {
>> mbind(shm, 1024 * PAGE_SIZE, MPOL_LOCAL, mask, maxnode, 0);
>> mbind(shm + 128 * PAGE_SIZE, 128 * PAGE_SIZE, MPOL_DEFAULT, mask, maxnode, 0);
>> }
>>
>> If there're many process doing the above work, mpol_new will be leaked easily.
>> So should I resend this patch with Cc stable? But it seems I'am not supposed
>> to make this decision and the maintainer will take care of this?
>
> I would just add
> Fixes: 42288fe366c4 ("mm: mempolicy: Convert shared_policy mutex to spinlock")
> Cc: stable # 3.8
>
> And also add your above reproducer snippet added to the original changelog.
> This would be more then enough to conclude the importance.
Will do. Many thanks for your patience and suggestion!
>
> Thank you for working hard on this!
Thanks. :)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists