[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <abcbf5d2-c348-7dc0-cfd3-9bcc6431bc64@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:50:08 +0800
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Brian Johannesmeyer <bjohannesmeyer@...il.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: fix check if list iterator did find an element
On 3/20/22 4:31 AM, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> Instead of setting 'res' to NULL, it should only be set if
> the suitable element was found.
>
> In the original code 'res' would have been set to an incorrect pointer
> if the list is empty.
>
The logic before iteration can make sure track_list won't be empty.
Please refer the discussion via:
https://lore.kernel.org/ocfs2-devel/bd0ec87e-b490-83dc-2363-5e5342c59fa4@linux.alibaba.com/T/#m96d4397930201d83d68677c33a9721ae8dbd8f15
Thanks,
Joseph
> In preparation to limit the scope of the list iterator to the list
> traversal loop, use a dedicated pointer pointing to the found element [1].
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YhdfEIwI4EdtHdym@kroah.com/
> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.c
> index d442cf5dda8a..be5e9ed7da8d 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.c
> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static void *lockres_seq_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> struct debug_lockres *dl = m->private;
> struct dlm_ctxt *dlm = dl->dl_ctxt;
> struct dlm_lock_resource *oldres = dl->dl_res;
> - struct dlm_lock_resource *res = NULL;
> + struct dlm_lock_resource *res = NULL, *iter;
> struct list_head *track_list;
>
> spin_lock(&dlm->track_lock);
> @@ -556,11 +556,11 @@ static void *lockres_seq_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> }
> }
>
> - list_for_each_entry(res, track_list, tracking) {
> - if (&res->tracking == &dlm->tracking_list)
> - res = NULL;
> - else
> - dlm_lockres_get(res);
> + list_for_each_entry(iter, track_list, tracking) {
> + if (&iter->tracking != &dlm->tracking_list) {
> + dlm_lockres_get(iter);
> + res = iter;
> + }
> break;
> }
> spin_unlock(&dlm->track_lock);
>
> base-commit: 34e047aa16c0123bbae8e2f6df33e5ecc1f56601
> --
> 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists