[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjhLwNoTbg1UU2qH@nanopsycho>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:56:16 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Sun Shouxin <sunshouxin@...natelecom.cn>
Cc: j.vosburgh@...il.com, vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org, oliver@...kum.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
huyd12@...natelecom.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] net:bonding:Add support for IPV6 RLB to
balance-alb mode
Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 09:47:04AM CET, sunshouxin@...natelecom.cn wrote:
>This patch is implementing IPV6 RLB for balance-alb mode.
As I stated in the other thread, I strongly believe it is bad idea to
add this code. It is not needed. User should use LACP and not obscure
ALB/RLB mode. It should not be extented. On contrary, I would like to
see this going opposite direction and eventually remove ALB/RLB mode
from bonding.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists