linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 04/11] iommu/vt-d: Add SVA domain support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5c4f0b10-1aa6-74cd-333d-46619aa9b27b@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Mar 2022 18:37:06 +0800
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>
Cc:     baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 04/11] iommu/vt-d: Add SVA domain support

On 2022/3/21 15:45, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 2:40 PM
>>
>> Add support for SVA domain allocation and provide an SVA-specific
>> iommu_domain_ops.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/intel-iommu.h |  1 +
>>   drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>   drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c   | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
>> index 2f9891cb3d00..c14283137fb5 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
>> @@ -744,6 +744,7 @@ void intel_svm_unbind(struct iommu_sva *handle);
>>   u32 intel_svm_get_pasid(struct iommu_sva *handle);
>>   int intel_svm_page_response(struct device *dev, struct iommu_fault_event
>> *evt,
>>   			    struct iommu_page_response *msg);
>> +extern const struct iommu_domain_ops intel_svm_domain_ops;
>>
>>   struct intel_svm_dev {
>>   	struct list_head list;
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>> index c1b91bce1530..d55dca3eacf8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>> @@ -4318,6 +4318,18 @@ static struct iommu_domain
>> *intel_iommu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
>>   		return domain;
>>   	case IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY:
>>   		return &si_domain->domain;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
>> +	case IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA:
>> +		dmar_domain = alloc_domain(type);
>> +		if (!dmar_domain) {
>> +			pr_err("Can't allocate sva domain\n");
>> +			return NULL;
>> +		}
>> +		domain = &dmar_domain->domain;
>> +		domain->ops = &intel_svm_domain_ops;
>> +
>> +		return domain;
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM */
>>   	default:
>>   		return NULL;
>>   	}
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
>> index ee5ecde5b318..b9f4dd7057d1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
>> @@ -932,3 +932,37 @@ int intel_svm_page_response(struct device *dev,
>>   	mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex);
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>> +
>> +static int intel_svm_attach_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> +				      struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
>> +{
>> +	struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
>> +	struct mm_struct *mm = domain->sva_cookie;
>> +	struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
>> +	struct iommu_sva *sva;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&pasid_mutex);
>> +	sva = intel_svm_bind_mm(iommu, dev, mm);
>> +	mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex);
>> +
> 
> I'm not sure whether this is the right implementation of this callback.
> In last patch you said it will be used for multiple usages but here it
> is fixed to mm binding.

It is for svm domain ops so it should be mm binding only. For other
usages, they should have different domain ops.

> Also the pasid argument is not used at all
> and instead it is retrieved from mm struct implicitly.

The pasid is not used here because it has already been stored in
mm->pasid. Since it's only for SVM domain, I think it's okay.

> 
> Basically SVA requires three steps:
> 
> 1) alloc a SVA-type domain;
> 2) construct the domain to wrap mm;
> 3) attach the domain to a PASID;
> 
> If we aim .attach_dev_pasid to be generic it may suggest that 1) and 2)
> should be done before .attach_dev_pasid then within this callback it
> just deals with domain/pasid attach in a generic way.

You are right. This code does have room for further cleanup. I would
like to put that in a separated series so that we could focus on the
generic SVA and IOPF refactoring.

> 
>> +	return IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sva);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void intel_svm_detach_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> +				       struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
>> +{
>> +	mutex_lock(&pasid_mutex);
>> +	intel_svm_unbind_mm(dev, pasid);
>> +	mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void intel_svm_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>> +{
>> +	kfree(domain);
>> +}
>> +
>> +const struct iommu_domain_ops intel_svm_domain_ops = {
>> +	.attach_dev_pasid	= intel_svm_attach_dev_pasid,
>> +	.detach_dev_pasid	= intel_svm_detach_dev_pasid,
>> +	.free			= intel_svm_domain_free,
>> +};
>> --
>> 2.25.1
> 

Best regards,
baolu